VST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Constellation Energy has a net margin of 10.92% compared to Vistra's net margin of 1.74%. Vistra's return on equity of 38.93% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity of 23.62%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $163.61, signalling upside risk potential of 17.28%. On the other hand Constellation Energy has an analysts' consensus of $289.47 which suggests that it could grow by 7.96%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Constellation Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Vistra has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Constellation Energy offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy pays out 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Constellation Energy quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Vistra's net income of $441M is higher than Constellation Energy's net income of $118M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.79x while Constellation Energy's PE ratio is 28.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 2.84x versus 3.49x for Constellation Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exelon has a net margin of 10.92% compared to Vistra's net margin of 13.52%. Vistra's return on equity of 38.93% beat Exelon's return on equity of 10.16%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $163.61, signalling upside risk potential of 17.28%. On the other hand Exelon has an analysts' consensus of $47.53 which suggests that it could grow by 2.58%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Exelon, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Exelon.

Vistra has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exelon has a beta of 0.437, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.261%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Exelon offers a yield of 3.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Exelon pays out 61.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Exelon quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Vistra's net income of $441M is lower than Exelon's net income of $908M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.79x while Exelon's PE ratio is 17.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 2.84x versus 1.97x for Exelon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextEra Energy has a net margin of 10.92% compared to Vistra's net margin of 13.33%. Vistra's return on equity of 38.93% beat NextEra Energy's return on equity of 9.2%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $163.61, signalling upside risk potential of 17.28%. On the other hand NextEra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $81.95 which suggests that it could grow by 21.67%. Given that NextEra Energy has higher upside potential than Vistra, analysts believe NextEra Energy is more attractive than Vistra.

Vistra has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextEra Energy has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.565%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. NextEra Energy offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. NextEra Energy pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than NextEra Energy quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Vistra's net income of $441M is lower than NextEra Energy's net income of $833M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.79x while NextEra Energy's PE ratio is 25.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 2.84x versus 5.49x for NextEra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 10.92% compared to Vistra's net margin of 16.8%. Vistra's return on equity of 38.93% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of 29.37%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $163.61, signalling upside risk potential of 17.28%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $256.29 which suggests that it could grow by 10.8%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Talen Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Talen Energy.

Vistra has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $488M. Vistra's net income of $441M is higher than Talen Energy's net income of $82M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.79x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is 20.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 2.84x versus 6.19x for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.