VST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NextEra Energy has a net margin of 30.03% compared to Vistra's net margin of 24.48%. Vistra's return on equity of -- beat NextEra Energy's return on equity of 11.88%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $161.33, signalling downside risk potential of -1.6%. On the other hand NextEra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $86.65 which suggests that it could grow by 21.63%. Given that NextEra Energy has higher upside potential than Vistra, analysts believe NextEra Energy is more attractive than Vistra.

Vistra has a beta of 1.210, which suggesting that the stock is 20.99% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextEra Energy has a beta of 0.576, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.369%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. NextEra Energy offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Vistra pays 31.01% of its earnings as a dividend. NextEra Energy pays out 51.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are smaller than NextEra Energy quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Vistra's net income of $1.9B is higher than NextEra Energy's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NextEra Energy's PE ratio is 21.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is -- versus 5.58x for NextEra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NRG Energy has a net margin of 30.03% compared to Vistra's net margin of -10.62%. Vistra's return on equity of -- beat NRG Energy's return on equity of 30.38%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $161.33, signalling downside risk potential of -1.6%. On the other hand NRG Energy has an analysts' consensus of $97.11 which suggests that it could fall by -0.08%. Given that Vistra has more downside risk than NRG Energy, analysts believe NRG Energy is more attractive than Vistra.

Vistra has a beta of 1.210, which suggesting that the stock is 20.99% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy has a beta of 1.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.724%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. NRG Energy offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Vistra pays 31.01% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy pays out -188.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are smaller than NRG Energy quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Vistra's net income of $1.9B is higher than NRG Energy's net income of -$767M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NRG Energy's PE ratio is 25.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is -- versus 0.75x for NRG Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oklo has a net margin of 30.03% compared to Vistra's net margin of --. Vistra's return on equity of -- beat Oklo's return on equity of --.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $161.33, signalling downside risk potential of -1.6%. On the other hand Oklo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -25%. Given that Oklo has more downside risk than Vistra, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Oklo.

Vistra has a beta of 1.210, which suggesting that the stock is 20.99% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oklo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Oklo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vistra pays 31.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Oklo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are larger than Oklo quarterly revenues of --. Vistra's net income of $1.9B is higher than Oklo's net income of -$10M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oklo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is -- versus -- for Oklo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 30.03% compared to Vistra's net margin of 30.27%. Vistra's return on equity of -- beat Talen Energy's return on equity of --.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $161.33, signalling downside risk potential of -1.6%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $253.74 which suggests that it could grow by 16.29%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than Vistra, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than Vistra.

Vistra has a beta of 1.210, which suggesting that the stock is 20.99% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vistra pays 31.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $555M. Vistra's net income of $1.9B is higher than Talen Energy's net income of $168M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Talen Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is -- versus -- for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.