VST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Constellation Energy has a net margin of -6.81% compared to Vistra's net margin of 1.74%. Vistra's return on equity of 36.03% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity of 23.62%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $166.97, signalling upside risk potential of 5.57%. On the other hand Constellation Energy has an analysts' consensus of $292.76 which suggests that it could fall by -1.59%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Constellation Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Vistra has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. Constellation Energy offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy pays out 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than Constellation Energy quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Vistra's net income of -$268M is lower than Constellation Energy's net income of $118M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.87x while Constellation Energy's PE ratio is 31.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 3.04x versus 3.87x for Constellation Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NRG Energy has a net margin of -6.81% compared to Vistra's net margin of 8.74%. Vistra's return on equity of 36.03% beat NRG Energy's return on equity of 46.41%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $166.97, signalling upside risk potential of 5.57%. On the other hand NRG Energy has an analysts' consensus of $149.13 which suggests that it could fall by -5.5%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than NRG Energy.

Vistra has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.471%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. NRG Energy offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy pays out 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than NRG Energy quarterly revenues of $8.6B. Vistra's net income of -$268M is lower than NRG Energy's net income of $750M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.87x while NRG Energy's PE ratio is 25.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 3.04x versus 1.12x for NRG Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oklo has a net margin of -6.81% compared to Vistra's net margin of --. Vistra's return on equity of 36.03% beat Oklo's return on equity of --.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $166.97, signalling upside risk potential of 5.57%. On the other hand Oklo has an analysts' consensus of $51.76 which suggests that it could fall by -1.09%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Oklo, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Oklo.

Vistra has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oklo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. Oklo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Oklo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Oklo quarterly revenues of --. Vistra's net income of -$268M is lower than Oklo's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.87x while Oklo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 3.04x versus -- for Oklo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of -6.81% compared to Vistra's net margin of -21.4%. Vistra's return on equity of 36.03% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of 30.01%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $166.97, signalling upside risk potential of 5.57%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $257.90 which suggests that it could grow by 6.1%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than Vistra, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than Vistra.

Vistra has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.258% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $631M. Vistra's net income of -$268M is lower than Talen Energy's net income of -$135M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.87x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is 25.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 3.04x versus 6.16x for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.