VEL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mr. Cooper Group has a net margin of 32.36% compared to Velocity Financial's net margin of 23.45%. Velocity Financial's return on equity of 14.4% beat Mr. Cooper Group's return on equity of 14.72%.

Velocity Financial has a consensus price target of $21.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.25%. On the other hand Mr. Cooper Group has an analysts' consensus of $126.63 which suggests that it could grow by 21.18%. Given that Mr. Cooper Group has higher upside potential than Velocity Financial, analysts believe Mr. Cooper Group is more attractive than Velocity Financial.

Velocity Financial has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.445% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mr. Cooper Group has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.407%.

Velocity Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mr. Cooper Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Velocity Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mr. Cooper Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Velocity Financial quarterly revenues are $63.6M, which are smaller than Mr. Cooper Group quarterly revenues of $870M. Velocity Financial's net income of $20.6M is lower than Mr. Cooper Group's net income of $204M. Notably, Velocity Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.66x while Mr. Cooper Group's PE ratio is 10.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Velocity Financial is 3.13x versus 2.28x for Mr. Cooper Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Onity Group has a net margin of 32.36% compared to Velocity Financial's net margin of -11.08%. Velocity Financial's return on equity of 14.4% beat Onity Group's return on equity of 7.56%.

Velocity Financial has a consensus price target of $21.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.25%. On the other hand Onity Group has an analysts' consensus of $43.75 which suggests that it could grow by 39.11%. Given that Onity Group has higher upside potential than Velocity Financial, analysts believe Onity Group is more attractive than Velocity Financial.

Velocity Financial has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.445% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Onity Group has a beta of 1.984, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.408%.

Velocity Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Onity Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Velocity Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Onity Group pays out 1.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Onity Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Velocity Financial quarterly revenues are $63.6M, which are smaller than Onity Group quarterly revenues of $253.6M. Velocity Financial's net income of $20.6M is higher than Onity Group's net income of -$28.1M. Notably, Velocity Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.66x while Onity Group's PE ratio is 7.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Velocity Financial is 3.13x versus 0.24x for Onity Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Companies has a net margin of 32.36% compared to Velocity Financial's net margin of 1.97%. Velocity Financial's return on equity of 14.4% beat Rocket Companies's return on equity of 0.34%.

Velocity Financial has a consensus price target of $21.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.25%. On the other hand Rocket Companies has an analysts' consensus of $13.75 which suggests that it could grow by 5.53%. Given that Velocity Financial has higher upside potential than Rocket Companies, analysts believe Velocity Financial is more attractive than Rocket Companies.

Velocity Financial has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.445% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Companies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Velocity Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rocket Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Velocity Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Velocity Financial quarterly revenues are $63.6M, which are smaller than Rocket Companies quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Velocity Financial's net income of $20.6M is lower than Rocket Companies's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Velocity Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.66x while Rocket Companies's PE ratio is 81.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Velocity Financial is 3.13x versus 2.83x for Rocket Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UWM Holdings has a net margin of 32.36% compared to Velocity Financial's net margin of 2.65%. Velocity Financial's return on equity of 14.4% beat UWM Holdings's return on equity of 0.63%.

Velocity Financial has a consensus price target of $21.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.25%. On the other hand UWM Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.97 which suggests that it could grow by 24.06%. Given that UWM Holdings has higher upside potential than Velocity Financial, analysts believe UWM Holdings is more attractive than Velocity Financial.

Velocity Financial has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.445% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UWM Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Velocity Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UWM Holdings offers a yield of 7.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Velocity Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UWM Holdings pays out 275.85% of its earnings as a dividend.

Velocity Financial quarterly revenues are $63.6M, which are smaller than UWM Holdings quarterly revenues of $336.3M. Velocity Financial's net income of $20.6M is higher than UWM Holdings's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Velocity Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.66x while UWM Holdings's PE ratio is 70.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Velocity Financial is 3.13x versus 1.94x for UWM Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.