SPHR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cineverse has a net margin of -40.85% compared to Sphere Entertainment's net margin of 17.46%. Sphere Entertainment's return on equity of -13.73% beat Cineverse's return on equity of -35.17%.

Sphere Entertainment has a consensus price target of $46.78, signalling upside risk potential of 84.31%. On the other hand Cineverse has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 198.25%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Sphere Entertainment, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Sphere Entertainment.

Sphere Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cineverse has a beta of 1.620, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.974%.

Sphere Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cineverse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sphere Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cineverse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sphere Entertainment quarterly revenues are $308.3M, which are larger than Cineverse quarterly revenues of $40.7M. Sphere Entertainment's net income of -$126M is lower than Cineverse's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Sphere Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.62x while Cineverse's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sphere Entertainment is 0.80x versus 0.62x for Cineverse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Media has a net margin of -40.85% compared to Sphere Entertainment's net margin of -21.25%. Sphere Entertainment's return on equity of -13.73% beat Liberty Media's return on equity of -0.44%.

Sphere Entertainment has a consensus price target of $46.78, signalling upside risk potential of 84.31%. On the other hand Liberty Media has an analysts' consensus of $97.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.83%. Given that Sphere Entertainment has higher upside potential than Liberty Media, analysts believe Sphere Entertainment is more attractive than Liberty Media.

Sphere Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Media has a beta of 0.898, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.221%.

Sphere Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Liberty Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share. Sphere Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sphere Entertainment quarterly revenues are $308.3M, which are smaller than Liberty Media quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Sphere Entertainment's net income of -$126M is higher than Liberty Media's net income of -$248M. Notably, Sphere Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.62x while Liberty Media's PE ratio is 73.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sphere Entertainment is 0.80x versus 5.01x for Liberty Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaia has a net margin of -40.85% compared to Sphere Entertainment's net margin of -3.29%. Sphere Entertainment's return on equity of -13.73% beat Gaia's return on equity of -5.72%.

Sphere Entertainment has a consensus price target of $46.78, signalling upside risk potential of 84.31%. On the other hand Gaia has an analysts' consensus of $8.38 which suggests that it could grow by 108.85%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Sphere Entertainment, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Sphere Entertainment.

Sphere Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaia has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.085000000000002%.

Sphere Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gaia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sphere Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gaia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sphere Entertainment quarterly revenues are $308.3M, which are larger than Gaia quarterly revenues of $24.4M. Sphere Entertainment's net income of -$126M is lower than Gaia's net income of -$803K. Notably, Sphere Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.62x while Gaia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sphere Entertainment is 0.80x versus 1.04x for Gaia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of -40.85% compared to Sphere Entertainment's net margin of -2.81%. Sphere Entertainment's return on equity of -13.73% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -32.18%.

Sphere Entertainment has a consensus price target of $46.78, signalling upside risk potential of 84.31%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.75 which suggests that it could grow by 18.49%. Given that Sphere Entertainment has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Sphere Entertainment is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Sphere Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.314, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.369%.

Sphere Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Sphere Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sphere Entertainment quarterly revenues are $308.3M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $8B. Sphere Entertainment's net income of -$126M is higher than Paramount Global's net income of -$224M. Notably, Sphere Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.62x while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sphere Entertainment is 0.80x versus 0.24x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.