SMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genesis Energy LP has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Summit Midstream's net margin of -117.77%. Summit Midstream's return on equity of -10.09% beat Genesis Energy LP's return on equity of -37.89%.

Summit Midstream has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -18.12%. On the other hand Genesis Energy LP has an analysts' consensus of $16.33 which suggests that it could fall by -2.49%. Given that Summit Midstream has more downside risk than Genesis Energy LP, analysts believe Genesis Energy LP is more attractive than Summit Midstream.

Summit Midstream has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genesis Energy LP has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.19%.

Summit Midstream has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genesis Energy LP offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Summit Midstream pays -5.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Genesis Energy LP pays out -254.73% of its earnings as a dividend.

Summit Midstream quarterly revenues are $132.7M, which are smaller than Genesis Energy LP quarterly revenues of $398.3M. Summit Midstream's net income of $5.6M is higher than Genesis Energy LP's net income of -$469.1M. Notably, Summit Midstream's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.98x while Genesis Energy LP's PE ratio is 34.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Summit Midstream is 0.64x versus 0.79x for Genesis Energy LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Summit Midstream's net margin of 72.8%. Summit Midstream's return on equity of -10.09% beat Marine Petroleum Trust's return on equity of 76.77%.

Summit Midstream has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -18.12%. On the other hand Marine Petroleum Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Summit Midstream has higher upside potential than Marine Petroleum Trust, analysts believe Summit Midstream is more attractive than Marine Petroleum Trust.

Summit Midstream has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Petroleum Trust has a beta of 0.054, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.611%.

Summit Midstream has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marine Petroleum Trust offers a yield of 8.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Summit Midstream pays -5.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Petroleum Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Summit Midstream quarterly revenues are $132.7M, which are larger than Marine Petroleum Trust quarterly revenues of $333K. Summit Midstream's net income of $5.6M is higher than Marine Petroleum Trust's net income of $242.4K. Notably, Summit Midstream's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.98x while Marine Petroleum Trust's PE ratio is 10.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Summit Midstream is 0.64x versus 7.90x for Marine Petroleum Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Summit Midstream's net margin of 0.7%. Summit Midstream's return on equity of -10.09% beat Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 1%.

Summit Midstream has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -18.12%. On the other hand Plains GP Holdings LP has an analysts' consensus of $21.23 which suggests that it could grow by 17.36%. Given that Plains GP Holdings LP has higher upside potential than Summit Midstream, analysts believe Plains GP Holdings LP is more attractive than Summit Midstream.

Summit Midstream has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 0.676, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.43%.

Summit Midstream has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plains GP Holdings LP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Summit Midstream pays -5.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains GP Holdings LP pays out 243.69% of its earnings as a dividend.

Summit Midstream quarterly revenues are $132.7M, which are smaller than Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues of $12B. Summit Midstream's net income of $5.6M is lower than Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $84M. Notably, Summit Midstream's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.98x while Plains GP Holdings LP's PE ratio is 24.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Summit Midstream is 0.64x versus 0.07x for Plains GP Holdings LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sabine Royalty Trust has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Summit Midstream's net margin of 93.57%. Summit Midstream's return on equity of -10.09% beat Sabine Royalty Trust's return on equity of 876.22%.

Summit Midstream has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -18.12%. On the other hand Sabine Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -51.09%. Given that Sabine Royalty Trust has more downside risk than Summit Midstream, analysts believe Summit Midstream is more attractive than Sabine Royalty Trust.

Summit Midstream has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sabine Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.299, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.141%.

Summit Midstream has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sabine Royalty Trust offers a yield of 7.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Summit Midstream pays -5.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Sabine Royalty Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Summit Midstream quarterly revenues are $132.7M, which are larger than Sabine Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Summit Midstream's net income of $5.6M is lower than Sabine Royalty Trust's net income of $18.1M. Notably, Summit Midstream's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.98x while Sabine Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 12.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Summit Midstream is 0.64x versus 11.93x for Sabine Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.