RH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of 4.09% compared to RH's net margin of 7.7%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 40.21%.

RH has a consensus price target of $457.48, signalling upside risk potential of 103.27%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $234.40 which suggests that it could grow by 20.51%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Dick's Sporting Goods, analysts believe RH is more attractive than Dick's Sporting Goods.

RH has a beta of 2.504, which suggesting that the stock is 150.385% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.536, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.609%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RH quarterly revenues are $811.7M, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.9B. RH's net income of $33.2M is lower than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $300M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.67x while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 13.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.41x versus 1.20x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Five Below has a net margin of 4.09% compared to RH's net margin of 0.2%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Five Below's return on equity of 17.27%.

RH has a consensus price target of $457.48, signalling upside risk potential of 103.27%. On the other hand Five Below has an analysts' consensus of $115.15 which suggests that it could grow by 57.74%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Five Below, analysts believe RH is more attractive than Five Below.

RH has a beta of 2.504, which suggesting that the stock is 150.385% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.791%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five Below offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $811.7M, which are smaller than Five Below quarterly revenues of $843.7M. RH's net income of $33.2M is higher than Five Below's net income of $1.7M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.67x while Five Below's PE ratio is 15.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.41x versus 1.05x for Five Below. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

1-800-Flowers.com has a net margin of 4.09% compared to RH's net margin of 8.3%. RH's return on equity of -- beat 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -1.6%.

RH has a consensus price target of $457.48, signalling upside risk potential of 103.27%. On the other hand 1-800-Flowers.com has an analysts' consensus of $9.88 which suggests that it could grow by 69.09%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than 1-800-Flowers.com, analysts believe RH is more attractive than 1-800-Flowers.com.

RH has a beta of 2.504, which suggesting that the stock is 150.385% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.811, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.07%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1-800-Flowers.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-Flowers.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $811.7M, which are larger than 1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues of $775.5M. RH's net income of $33.2M is lower than 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of $64.3M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.67x while 1-800-Flowers.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.41x versus 0.21x for 1-800-Flowers.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams-Sonoma has a net margin of 4.09% compared to RH's net margin of 13.83%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 53.11%.

RH has a consensus price target of $457.48, signalling upside risk potential of 103.27%. On the other hand Williams-Sonoma has an analysts' consensus of $183.85 which suggests that it could grow by 9.76%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe RH is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

RH has a beta of 2.504, which suggesting that the stock is 150.385% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.822, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.172%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Williams-Sonoma offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma pays out 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RH quarterly revenues are $811.7M, which are smaller than Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues of $1.8B. RH's net income of $33.2M is lower than Williams-Sonoma's net income of $249M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.67x while Williams-Sonoma's PE ratio is 19.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.41x versus 2.88x for Williams-Sonoma. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.