PRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intellinetics has a net margin of 0.28% compared to Pros Holdings's net margin of -8.56%. Pros Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -4.31%.

Pros Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 35.81%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $11.85 which suggests that it could grow by 37.53%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Pros Holdings, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Pros Holdings.

Pros Holdings has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.585% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.468, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.162%.

Pros Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pros Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pros Holdings quarterly revenues are $82.7M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.6M. Pros Holdings's net income of $235K is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$392.9K. Notably, Pros Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 227.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pros Holdings is 3.28x versus 3.56x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sabre has a net margin of 0.28% compared to Pros Holdings's net margin of -8.22%. Pros Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Sabre's return on equity of --.

Pros Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 35.81%. On the other hand Sabre has an analysts' consensus of $4.31 which suggests that it could grow by 21.35%. Given that Pros Holdings has higher upside potential than Sabre, analysts believe Pros Holdings is more attractive than Sabre.

Pros Holdings has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.585% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sabre has a beta of 1.799, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.894%.

Pros Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sabre offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pros Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sabre pays out -3.04% of its earnings as a dividend.

Pros Holdings quarterly revenues are $82.7M, which are smaller than Sabre quarterly revenues of $764.7M. Pros Holdings's net income of $235K is higher than Sabre's net income of -$62.8M. Notably, Pros Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sabre's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pros Holdings is 3.28x versus 0.48x for Sabre. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of 0.28% compared to Pros Holdings's net margin of -2893.73%. Pros Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Pros Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 35.81%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pros Holdings has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Pros Holdings is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Pros Holdings has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.585% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pros Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pros Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -14.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

Pros Holdings quarterly revenues are $82.7M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $55.4K. Pros Holdings's net income of $235K is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Pros Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pros Holdings is 3.28x versus 1.62x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 0.28% compared to Pros Holdings's net margin of -1.23%. Pros Holdings's return on equity of -- beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Pros Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 35.81%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.4%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Pros Holdings, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Pros Holdings.

Pros Holdings has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.585% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.645%.

Pros Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pros Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pros Holdings quarterly revenues are $82.7M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Pros Holdings's net income of $235K is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Pros Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pros Holdings is 3.28x versus 0.31x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.