PL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Momentus has a net margin of -57.11% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -7250.47%. Planet Labs PBC's return on equity of -25.69% beat Momentus's return on equity of -4939.96%.

Planet Labs PBC has a consensus price target of $5.80, signalling upside risk potential of 60.67%. On the other hand Momentus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 41816.15%. Given that Momentus has higher upside potential than Planet Labs PBC, analysts believe Momentus is more attractive than Planet Labs PBC.

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Momentus has a beta of 1.232, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.153%.

Planet Labs PBC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Momentus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Labs PBC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Momentus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Labs PBC quarterly revenues are $61.6M, which are larger than Momentus quarterly revenues of $107K. Planet Labs PBC's net income of -$35.2M is lower than Momentus's net income of -$7.8M. Notably, Planet Labs PBC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Momentus's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Labs PBC is 4.32x versus 1.21x for Momentus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Network-1 Technologies has a net margin of -57.11% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -658%. Planet Labs PBC's return on equity of -25.69% beat Network-1 Technologies's return on equity of -3.88%.

Planet Labs PBC has a consensus price target of $5.80, signalling upside risk potential of 60.67%. On the other hand Network-1 Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Planet Labs PBC has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies, analysts believe Planet Labs PBC is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies.

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Network-1 Technologies has a beta of 0.071, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.938%.

Planet Labs PBC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Network-1 Technologies offers a yield of 8.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Planet Labs PBC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies pays out -77.98% of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Labs PBC quarterly revenues are $61.6M, which are larger than Network-1 Technologies quarterly revenues of $100K. Planet Labs PBC's net income of -$35.2M is lower than Network-1 Technologies's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Planet Labs PBC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Network-1 Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Labs PBC is 4.32x versus -- for Network-1 Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Outdoor Holding has a net margin of -57.11% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -22.81%. Planet Labs PBC's return on equity of -25.69% beat Outdoor Holding's return on equity of -5.99%.

Planet Labs PBC has a consensus price target of $5.80, signalling upside risk potential of 60.67%. On the other hand Outdoor Holding has an analysts' consensus of $2.38 which suggests that it could grow by 18.16%. Given that Planet Labs PBC has higher upside potential than Outdoor Holding, analysts believe Planet Labs PBC is more attractive than Outdoor Holding.

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Outdoor Holding has a beta of 1.307, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.72%.

Planet Labs PBC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Outdoor Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Labs PBC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding pays out -19.07% of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Labs PBC quarterly revenues are $61.6M, which are larger than Outdoor Holding quarterly revenues of $31M. Planet Labs PBC's net income of -$35.2M is lower than Outdoor Holding's net income of -$7.1M. Notably, Planet Labs PBC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Outdoor Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Labs PBC is 4.32x versus 1.68x for Outdoor Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sidus Space has a net margin of -57.11% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -208.81%. Planet Labs PBC's return on equity of -25.69% beat Sidus Space's return on equity of -137.36%.

Planet Labs PBC has a consensus price target of $5.80, signalling upside risk potential of 60.67%. On the other hand Sidus Space has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 549.35%. Given that Sidus Space has higher upside potential than Planet Labs PBC, analysts believe Sidus Space is more attractive than Planet Labs PBC.

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sidus Space has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Planet Labs PBC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sidus Space offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Labs PBC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sidus Space pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Labs PBC quarterly revenues are $61.6M, which are larger than Sidus Space quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Planet Labs PBC's net income of -$35.2M is lower than Sidus Space's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Planet Labs PBC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sidus Space's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Labs PBC is 4.32x versus 1.67x for Sidus Space. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.