PII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Massimo Group has a net margin of 1.61% compared to Polaris's net margin of -9.77%. Polaris's return on equity of 14.92% beat Massimo Group's return on equity of 40.58%.

Polaris has a consensus price target of $78.79, signalling upside risk potential of 37.19%. On the other hand Massimo Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polaris has higher upside potential than Massimo Group, analysts believe Polaris is more attractive than Massimo Group.

Polaris has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Polaris has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.6%. Massimo Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polaris pays 29.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Massimo Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Polaris quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Massimo Group quarterly revenues of $25.6M. Polaris's net income of $27.7M is higher than Massimo Group's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Polaris's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Massimo Group's PE ratio is 14.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polaris is 0.42x versus 0.82x for Massimo Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 1.61% compared to Polaris's net margin of 8.61%. Polaris's return on equity of 14.92% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Polaris has a consensus price target of $78.79, signalling upside risk potential of 37.19%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -37.49%. Given that Polaris has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Polaris is more attractive than Tesla.

Polaris has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

Polaris has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.6%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polaris pays 29.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Polaris quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Polaris's net income of $27.7M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Polaris's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Tesla's PE ratio is 124.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polaris is 0.42x versus 16.31x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a net margin of 1.61% compared to Polaris's net margin of -86.59%. Polaris's return on equity of 14.92% beat Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -34.03%.

Polaris has a consensus price target of $78.79, signalling upside risk potential of 37.19%. On the other hand Twin Vee PowerCats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2153.52%. Given that Twin Vee PowerCats has higher upside potential than Polaris, analysts believe Twin Vee PowerCats is more attractive than Polaris.

Polaris has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Polaris has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.6%. Twin Vee PowerCats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polaris pays 29.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Vee PowerCats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Polaris quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues of $2.9M. Polaris's net income of $27.7M is higher than Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Polaris's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Twin Vee PowerCats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polaris is 0.42x versus 0.16x for Twin Vee PowerCats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vivic has a net margin of 1.61% compared to Polaris's net margin of 16.52%. Polaris's return on equity of 14.92% beat Vivic's return on equity of 185.07%.

Polaris has a consensus price target of $78.79, signalling upside risk potential of 37.19%. On the other hand Vivic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polaris has higher upside potential than Vivic, analysts believe Polaris is more attractive than Vivic.

Polaris has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vivic has a beta of 0.635, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.539%.

Polaris has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.6%. Vivic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polaris pays 29.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Vivic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Polaris quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Vivic quarterly revenues of $2.6M. Polaris's net income of $27.7M is higher than Vivic's net income of $425.2K. Notably, Polaris's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Vivic's PE ratio is 36.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polaris is 0.42x versus 17.87x for Vivic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.