NYT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fox has a net margin of 10.02% compared to New York Times's net margin of 23.2%. New York Times's return on equity of 15.87% beat Fox's return on equity of 17.53%.

New York Times has a consensus price target of $58.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand Fox has an analysts' consensus of $47.91 which suggests that it could fall by -3.12%. Given that New York Times has higher upside potential than Fox, analysts believe New York Times is more attractive than Fox.

New York Times has a beta of 0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 0.224% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fox has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.067%.

New York Times has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Fox offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. New York Times pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Fox pays out 18.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New York Times quarterly revenues are $640.2M, which are smaller than Fox quarterly revenues of $3.6B. New York Times's net income of $64.1M is lower than Fox's net income of $827M. Notably, New York Times's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.31x while Fox's PE ratio is 12.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New York Times is 3.46x versus 1.63x for Fox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gannett has a net margin of 10.02% compared to New York Times's net margin of -3.21%. New York Times's return on equity of 15.87% beat Gannett's return on equity of -41.58%.

New York Times has a consensus price target of $58.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand Gannett has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.06%. Given that Gannett has higher upside potential than New York Times, analysts believe Gannett is more attractive than New York Times.

New York Times has a beta of 0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 0.224% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gannett has a beta of 2.547, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.686%.

New York Times has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Gannett offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New York Times pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Gannett pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New York Times quarterly revenues are $640.2M, which are larger than Gannett quarterly revenues of $612.4M. New York Times's net income of $64.1M is higher than Gannett's net income of -$19.7M. Notably, New York Times's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.31x while Gannett's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New York Times is 3.46x versus 0.33x for Gannett. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lee Enterprises has a net margin of 10.02% compared to New York Times's net margin of -6.36%. New York Times's return on equity of 15.87% beat Lee Enterprises's return on equity of -232.94%.

New York Times has a consensus price target of $58.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand Lee Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 66.56%. Given that Lee Enterprises has higher upside potential than New York Times, analysts believe Lee Enterprises is more attractive than New York Times.

New York Times has a beta of 0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 0.224% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lee Enterprises has a beta of 1.019, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.854%.

New York Times has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Lee Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New York Times pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lee Enterprises pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New York Times quarterly revenues are $640.2M, which are larger than Lee Enterprises quarterly revenues of $158.6M. New York Times's net income of $64.1M is higher than Lee Enterprises's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, New York Times's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.31x while Lee Enterprises's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New York Times is 3.46x versus 0.15x for Lee Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 10.02% compared to New York Times's net margin of 38.65%. New York Times's return on equity of 15.87% beat Meta Platforms's return on equity of 36.21%.

New York Times has a consensus price target of $58.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand Meta Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $654.06 which suggests that it could grow by 9.04%. Given that New York Times has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe New York Times is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

New York Times has a beta of 0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 0.224% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.786%.

New York Times has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Meta Platforms offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. New York Times pays 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New York Times quarterly revenues are $640.2M, which are smaller than Meta Platforms quarterly revenues of $40.6B. New York Times's net income of $64.1M is lower than Meta Platforms's net income of $15.7B. Notably, New York Times's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.31x while Meta Platforms's PE ratio is 28.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New York Times is 3.46x versus 10.06x for Meta Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.