LRN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KinderCare Learning Companies has a net margin of 7.42% compared to Stride's net margin of --. Stride's return on equity of 21.9% beat KinderCare Learning Companies's return on equity of --.

Stride has a consensus price target of $86.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.92%. On the other hand KinderCare Learning Companies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Stride has higher upside potential than KinderCare Learning Companies, analysts believe Stride is more attractive than KinderCare Learning Companies.

Stride has a beta of 0.303, which suggesting that the stock is 69.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KinderCare Learning Companies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stride has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KinderCare Learning Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stride pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KinderCare Learning Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stride quarterly revenues are $551.1M, which are larger than KinderCare Learning Companies quarterly revenues of --. Stride's net income of $40.9M is higher than KinderCare Learning Companies's net income of --. Notably, Stride's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.18x while KinderCare Learning Companies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stride is 2.18x versus -- for KinderCare Learning Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of 7.42% compared to Stride's net margin of 3.46%. Stride's return on equity of 21.9% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.98%.

Stride has a consensus price target of $86.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.92%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.58%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Stride, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Stride.

Stride has a beta of 0.303, which suggesting that the stock is 69.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.214%.

Stride has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stride pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stride quarterly revenues are $551.1M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $114.4M. Stride's net income of $40.9M is higher than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $4M. Notably, Stride's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.18x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 49.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stride is 2.18x versus 1.15x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mynd.ai has a net margin of 7.42% compared to Stride's net margin of --. Stride's return on equity of 21.9% beat Mynd.ai's return on equity of -68.39%.

Stride has a consensus price target of $86.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.92%. On the other hand Mynd.ai has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Stride has higher upside potential than Mynd.ai, analysts believe Stride is more attractive than Mynd.ai.

Stride has a beta of 0.303, which suggesting that the stock is 69.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mynd.ai has a beta of 1.271, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.075%.

Stride has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mynd.ai offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share. Stride pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mynd.ai pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stride quarterly revenues are $551.1M, which are larger than Mynd.ai quarterly revenues of --. Stride's net income of $40.9M is higher than Mynd.ai's net income of --. Notably, Stride's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.18x while Mynd.ai's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stride is 2.18x versus 0.30x for Mynd.ai. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of 7.42% compared to Stride's net margin of 22.53%. Stride's return on equity of 21.9% beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 15.25%.

Stride has a consensus price target of $86.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.92%. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.63%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Stride, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Stride.

Stride has a beta of 0.303, which suggesting that the stock is 69.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.878%.

Stride has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Stride pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 9.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stride quarterly revenues are $551.1M, which are larger than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $169.8M. Stride's net income of $40.9M is higher than Perdoceo Education's net income of $38.3M. Notably, Stride's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.18x while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 13.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stride is 2.18x versus 2.75x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.