LNN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alamo Group has a net margin of 14.21% compared to Lindsay's net margin of 7.29%. Lindsay's return on equity of 15.69% beat Alamo Group's return on equity of 11.82%.

Lindsay has a consensus price target of $142.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.01%. On the other hand Alamo Group has an analysts' consensus of $203.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.92%. Given that Alamo Group has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Alamo Group is more attractive than Lindsay.

Lindsay has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.23% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alamo Group has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.0049999999999994%.

Lindsay has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Alamo Group offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Lindsay pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Alamo Group pays out 10.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lindsay quarterly revenues are $187.1M, which are smaller than Alamo Group quarterly revenues of $385.3M. Lindsay's net income of $26.6M is lower than Alamo Group's net income of $28.1M. Notably, Lindsay's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.03x while Alamo Group's PE ratio is 17.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindsay is 2.14x versus 1.26x for Alamo Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 14.21% compared to Lindsay's net margin of 10.52%. Lindsay's return on equity of 15.69% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 27.37%.

Lindsay has a consensus price target of $142.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.01%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $490.25 which suggests that it could grow by 6.78%. Given that Lindsay has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe Lindsay is more attractive than Deere &.

Lindsay has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.23% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.33000000000001%.

Lindsay has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Lindsay pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lindsay quarterly revenues are $187.1M, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Lindsay's net income of $26.6M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $869M. Notably, Lindsay's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.03x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 20.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindsay is 2.14x versus 2.69x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Toro has a net margin of 14.21% compared to Lindsay's net margin of 5.31%. Lindsay's return on equity of 15.69% beat The Toro's return on equity of 25.89%.

Lindsay has a consensus price target of $142.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.01%. On the other hand The Toro has an analysts' consensus of $91.20 which suggests that it could grow by 34.12%. Given that The Toro has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe The Toro is more attractive than Lindsay.

Lindsay has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.23% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Toro has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.545%.

Lindsay has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. The Toro offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Lindsay pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. The Toro pays out 35.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lindsay quarterly revenues are $187.1M, which are smaller than The Toro quarterly revenues of $995M. Lindsay's net income of $26.6M is lower than The Toro's net income of $52.8M. Notably, Lindsay's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.03x while The Toro's PE ratio is 17.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindsay is 2.14x versus 1.54x for The Toro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan International has a net margin of 14.21% compared to Lindsay's net margin of 0.35%. Lindsay's return on equity of 15.69% beat Titan International's return on equity of -0.99%.

Lindsay has a consensus price target of $142.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.01%. On the other hand Titan International has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 75.32%. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than Lindsay.

Lindsay has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.23% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan International has a beta of 1.640, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.992%.

Lindsay has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Titan International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindsay pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lindsay quarterly revenues are $187.1M, which are smaller than Titan International quarterly revenues of $383.6M. Lindsay's net income of $26.6M is higher than Titan International's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Lindsay's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.03x while Titan International's PE ratio is 18.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindsay is 2.14x versus 0.27x for Titan International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.