KOP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chemours has a net margin of 4.11% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of -1.8%. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 14.89% beat The Chemours's return on equity of 10.59%.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 103.15%. On the other hand The Chemours has an analysts' consensus of $24.22 which suggests that it could grow by 38.1%. Given that Koppers Holdings has higher upside potential than The Chemours, analysts believe Koppers Holdings is more attractive than The Chemours.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.835, which suggesting that the stock is 83.476% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chemours has a beta of 1.798, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.789%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. The Chemours offers a yield of 5.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 5.61% of its earnings as a dividend. The Chemours pays out -62.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $554.3M, which are smaller than The Chemours quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Koppers Holdings's net income of $22.8M is higher than The Chemours's net income of -$27M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.02x while The Chemours's PE ratio is 35.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.32x versus 0.46x for The Chemours. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 4.11% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of -0.63%. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 14.89% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 103.15%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Koppers Holdings has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Koppers Holdings is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.835, which suggesting that the stock is 83.476% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.002%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 5.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $554.3M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Koppers Holdings's net income of $22.8M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.02x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.32x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 4.11% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of --. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 14.89% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 103.15%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 259.6%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Koppers Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Koppers Holdings.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.835, which suggesting that the stock is 83.476% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.435%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 5.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $554.3M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Koppers Holdings's net income of $22.8M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.02x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.32x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 4.11% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of --. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 14.89% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 103.15%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 151.21%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Koppers Holdings, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Koppers Holdings.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.835, which suggesting that the stock is 83.476% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.55%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 5.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $554.3M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Koppers Holdings's net income of $22.8M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.02x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.32x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.