IOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of -3.24% compared to Samsara's net margin of -10.03%. Samsara's return on equity of -15.9% beat Castellum's return on equity of -42.29%.

Samsara has a consensus price target of $48.09, signalling upside risk potential of 5.7%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 191.26%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than Samsara, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than Samsara.

Samsara has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 498.483%.

Samsara has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Samsara pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

Samsara quarterly revenues are $346.3M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.7M. Samsara's net income of -$11.2M is lower than Castellum's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Samsara's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Samsara is 20.26x versus 1.44x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EverCommerce has a net margin of -3.24% compared to Samsara's net margin of -5.42%. Samsara's return on equity of -15.9% beat EverCommerce's return on equity of -4.22%.

Samsara has a consensus price target of $48.09, signalling upside risk potential of 5.7%. On the other hand EverCommerce has an analysts' consensus of $11.77 which suggests that it could grow by 21.12%. Given that EverCommerce has higher upside potential than Samsara, analysts believe EverCommerce is more attractive than Samsara.

Samsara has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EverCommerce has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Samsara has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EverCommerce offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Samsara pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EverCommerce pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Samsara quarterly revenues are $346.3M, which are larger than EverCommerce quarterly revenues of $142.3M. Samsara's net income of -$11.2M is lower than EverCommerce's net income of -$7.7M. Notably, Samsara's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EverCommerce's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Samsara is 20.26x versus 2.67x for EverCommerce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of -3.24% compared to Samsara's net margin of 24.22%. Samsara's return on equity of -15.9% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.3%.

Samsara has a consensus price target of $48.09, signalling upside risk potential of 5.7%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $96.61 which suggests that it could fall by -21.65%. Given that Samsara has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe Samsara is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

Samsara has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Samsara has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Samsara pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Samsara quarterly revenues are $346.3M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $883.9M. Samsara's net income of -$11.2M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $214M. Notably, Samsara's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 536.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Samsara is 20.26x versus 98.53x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SailPoint Technologies Holdings has a net margin of -3.24% compared to Samsara's net margin of --. Samsara's return on equity of -15.9% beat SailPoint Technologies Holdings's return on equity of --.

Samsara has a consensus price target of $48.09, signalling upside risk potential of 5.7%. On the other hand SailPoint Technologies Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Samsara has higher upside potential than SailPoint Technologies Holdings, analysts believe Samsara is more attractive than SailPoint Technologies Holdings.

Samsara has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SailPoint Technologies Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Samsara has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SailPoint Technologies Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Samsara pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SailPoint Technologies Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Samsara quarterly revenues are $346.3M, which are larger than SailPoint Technologies Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Samsara's net income of -$11.2M is higher than SailPoint Technologies Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Samsara's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SailPoint Technologies Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Samsara is 20.26x versus -- for SailPoint Technologies Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.