GPK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Berry Global Group has a net margin of 6.59% compared to Graphic Packaging Holding's net margin of 0.59%. Graphic Packaging Holding's return on equity of 22.73% beat Berry Global Group's return on equity of 14.9%.

Graphic Packaging Holding has a consensus price target of $31.05, signalling upside risk potential of 18.36%. On the other hand Berry Global Group has an analysts' consensus of $74.89 which suggests that it could grow by 6.82%. Given that Graphic Packaging Holding has higher upside potential than Berry Global Group, analysts believe Graphic Packaging Holding is more attractive than Berry Global Group.

Graphic Packaging Holding has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.337% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.131, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.101%.

Graphic Packaging Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Berry Global Group offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Graphic Packaging Holding pays 18.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Berry Global Group pays out 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graphic Packaging Holding quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Berry Global Group quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Graphic Packaging Holding's net income of $138M is higher than Berry Global Group's net income of $14M. Notably, Graphic Packaging Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.14x while Berry Global Group's PE ratio is 17.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graphic Packaging Holding is 0.91x versus 0.70x for Berry Global Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Crown Holdings has a net margin of 6.59% compared to Graphic Packaging Holding's net margin of 12.33%. Graphic Packaging Holding's return on equity of 22.73% beat Crown Holdings's return on equity of 14.09%.

Graphic Packaging Holding has a consensus price target of $31.05, signalling upside risk potential of 18.36%. On the other hand Crown Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $108.70 which suggests that it could grow by 22.05%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Graphic Packaging Holding, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Graphic Packaging Holding.

Graphic Packaging Holding has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.337% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.877, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.326%.

Graphic Packaging Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Crown Holdings offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Graphic Packaging Holding pays 18.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings pays out 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graphic Packaging Holding quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Crown Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Graphic Packaging Holding's net income of $138M is lower than Crown Holdings's net income of $358M. Notably, Graphic Packaging Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.14x while Crown Holdings's PE ratio is 25.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graphic Packaging Holding is 0.91x versus 0.90x for Crown Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 6.59% compared to Graphic Packaging Holding's net margin of --. Graphic Packaging Holding's return on equity of 22.73% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Graphic Packaging Holding has a consensus price target of $31.05, signalling upside risk potential of 18.36%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.79%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Graphic Packaging Holding, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Graphic Packaging Holding.

Graphic Packaging Holding has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.337% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.597%.

Graphic Packaging Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graphic Packaging Holding pays 18.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graphic Packaging Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graphic Packaging Holding quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Graphic Packaging Holding's net income of $138M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Graphic Packaging Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.14x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graphic Packaging Holding is 0.91x versus 143.72x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 6.59% compared to Graphic Packaging Holding's net margin of -42.85%. Graphic Packaging Holding's return on equity of 22.73% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

Graphic Packaging Holding has a consensus price target of $31.05, signalling upside risk potential of 18.36%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.88 which suggests that it could grow by 38.44%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Graphic Packaging Holding, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Graphic Packaging Holding.

Graphic Packaging Holding has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.337% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Graphic Packaging Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graphic Packaging Holding pays 18.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graphic Packaging Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graphic Packaging Holding quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Graphic Packaging Holding's net income of $138M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, Graphic Packaging Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.14x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graphic Packaging Holding is 0.91x versus 2.19x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.