Financhill
Buy
56

GOLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$70.88
Seasonality move :
-0.26%
Day range:
$70.19 - $71.31
52-week range:
$58.54 - $76.59
Dividend yield:
1.22%
P/E ratio:
23.66x
P/S ratio:
1.88x
P/B ratio:
4.98x
Volume:
114.8K
Avg. volume:
265.2K
1-year change:
12.09%
Market cap:
$4.3B
Revenue:
$2.4B
EPS (TTM):
$2.99

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings
$620.4M $0.83 10.14% -30.56% --
CLAR
Clarus
$73M $0.08 -9.77% -50% --
ESCA
Escalade
-- -- -- -- --
JOUT
Johnson Outdoors
$115M -$0.98 -23.75% -37.24% --
SPGC
Sacks Parente Golf
$970K -$0.66 797.44% -54.75% --
YYAI
Connexa Sports Technologies
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings
$70.74 -- $4.3B 23.66x $0.22 1.22% 1.88x
CLAR
Clarus
$4.44 -- $170.3M 34.15x $0.03 2.25% 0.63x
ESCA
Escalade
$14.61 -- $202.7M 15.54x $0.15 4.11% 0.81x
JOUT
Johnson Outdoors
$34.50 -- $355.3M 92.77x $0.33 3.83% 0.60x
SPGC
Sacks Parente Golf
$0.34 -- $624.2K -- $0.00 0% 0.20x
YYAI
Connexa Sports Technologies
$1.16 -- $16.9M -- $0.00 0% 0.56x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings
45.8% 1.785 18.53% 0.90x
CLAR
Clarus
-- 2.116 -- 2.55x
ESCA
Escalade
14.78% 1.661 15.11% 1.28x
JOUT
Johnson Outdoors
-- 1.066 -- 2.24x
SPGC
Sacks Parente Golf
-- 3.039 -- 2.21x
YYAI
Connexa Sports Technologies
24.87% -21.502 11.06% 1.35x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings
$337.4M $82.1M 11.4% 20.37% 13.23% $123.7M
CLAR
Clarus
$23.5M -$4.8M 1.38% 1.61% -7.12% -$9.4M
ESCA
Escalade
$16.8M $4.1M 6.11% 7.96% 11.78% $10.2M
JOUT
Johnson Outdoors
$24.9M -$31.6M -5.38% -5.38% -37.44% $13.5M
SPGC
Sacks Parente Golf
$805K -$1.1M -107.95% -107.95% -87.53% -$1.4M
YYAI
Connexa Sports Technologies
-$70.9K -$1.4M -314.75% -661.78% -376.99% $75.4K

Acushnet Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GOLF or CLAR?

    Clarus has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of -4.7%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 20.37% beat Clarus's return on equity of 1.61%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    54.37% $0.89 $1.6B
    CLAR
    Clarus
    35.01% -$0.08 $308.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About GOLF or CLAR?

    Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.37%. On the other hand Clarus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.94%. Given that Clarus has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Clarus is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    0 0 0
    CLAR
    Clarus
    0 0 0
  • Is GOLF or CLAR More Risky?

    Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clarus has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.913%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOLF or CLAR?

    Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Clarus offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 26.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Clarus pays out -36.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GOLF or CLAR?

    Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $620.5M, which are larger than Clarus quarterly revenues of $67.1M. Acushnet Holdings's net income of $56.2M is higher than Clarus's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.66x while Clarus's PE ratio is 34.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.88x versus 0.63x for Clarus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    1.88x 23.66x $620.5M $56.2M
    CLAR
    Clarus
    0.63x 34.15x $67.1M -$3.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns GOLF or ESCA?

    Escalade has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of 8.37%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 20.37% beat Escalade's return on equity of 7.96%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    54.37% $0.89 $1.6B
    ESCA
    Escalade
    24.79% $0.40 $199.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About GOLF or ESCA?

    Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.37%. On the other hand Escalade has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36.89%. Given that Escalade has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Escalade is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    0 0 0
    ESCA
    Escalade
    0 0 0
  • Is GOLF or ESCA More Risky?

    Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Escalade has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.646%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOLF or ESCA?

    Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Escalade offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 26.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Escalade pays out 62.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GOLF or ESCA?

    Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $620.5M, which are larger than Escalade quarterly revenues of $67.7M. Acushnet Holdings's net income of $56.2M is higher than Escalade's net income of $5.7M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.66x while Escalade's PE ratio is 15.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.88x versus 0.81x for Escalade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    1.88x 23.66x $620.5M $56.2M
    ESCA
    Escalade
    0.81x 15.54x $67.7M $5.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns GOLF or JOUT?

    Johnson Outdoors has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of -32.37%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 20.37% beat Johnson Outdoors's return on equity of -5.38%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    54.37% $0.89 $1.6B
    JOUT
    Johnson Outdoors
    23.49% -$3.35 $463.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About GOLF or JOUT?

    Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.37%. On the other hand Johnson Outdoors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.93%. Given that Johnson Outdoors has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Johnson Outdoors is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    0 0 0
    JOUT
    Johnson Outdoors
    0 0 0
  • Is GOLF or JOUT More Risky?

    Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson Outdoors has a beta of 0.708, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.158%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOLF or JOUT?

    Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Johnson Outdoors offers a yield of 3.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 26.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson Outdoors pays out -50.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GOLF or JOUT?

    Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $620.5M, which are larger than Johnson Outdoors quarterly revenues of $105.9M. Acushnet Holdings's net income of $56.2M is higher than Johnson Outdoors's net income of -$34.3M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.66x while Johnson Outdoors's PE ratio is 92.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.88x versus 0.60x for Johnson Outdoors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    1.88x 23.66x $620.5M $56.2M
    JOUT
    Johnson Outdoors
    0.60x 92.77x $105.9M -$34.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns GOLF or SPGC?

    Sacks Parente Golf has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of -87.53%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 20.37% beat Sacks Parente Golf's return on equity of -107.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    54.37% $0.89 $1.6B
    SPGC
    Sacks Parente Golf
    66.47% -$0.73 $2.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About GOLF or SPGC?

    Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.37%. On the other hand Sacks Parente Golf has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3409.8%. Given that Sacks Parente Golf has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Sacks Parente Golf is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    0 0 0
    SPGC
    Sacks Parente Golf
    0 0 0
  • Is GOLF or SPGC More Risky?

    Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sacks Parente Golf has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOLF or SPGC?

    Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Sacks Parente Golf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 26.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Sacks Parente Golf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GOLF or SPGC?

    Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $620.5M, which are larger than Sacks Parente Golf quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Acushnet Holdings's net income of $56.2M is higher than Sacks Parente Golf's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.66x while Sacks Parente Golf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.88x versus 0.20x for Sacks Parente Golf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    1.88x 23.66x $620.5M $56.2M
    SPGC
    Sacks Parente Golf
    0.20x -- $1.2M -$1.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns GOLF or YYAI?

    Connexa Sports Technologies has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Acushnet Holdings's net margin of -377.86%. Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 20.37% beat Connexa Sports Technologies's return on equity of -661.78%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    54.37% $0.89 $1.6B
    YYAI
    Connexa Sports Technologies
    -19.61% -$0.24 $10.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About GOLF or YYAI?

    Acushnet Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.37%. On the other hand Connexa Sports Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Acushnet Holdings has higher upside potential than Connexa Sports Technologies, analysts believe Acushnet Holdings is more attractive than Connexa Sports Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    0 0 0
    YYAI
    Connexa Sports Technologies
    0 0 0
  • Is GOLF or YYAI More Risky?

    Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Connexa Sports Technologies has a beta of 0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.283%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GOLF or YYAI?

    Acushnet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Connexa Sports Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acushnet Holdings pays 26.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Connexa Sports Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GOLF or YYAI?

    Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues are $620.5M, which are larger than Connexa Sports Technologies quarterly revenues of $361.5K. Acushnet Holdings's net income of $56.2M is higher than Connexa Sports Technologies's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Acushnet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.66x while Connexa Sports Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acushnet Holdings is 1.88x versus 0.56x for Connexa Sports Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GOLF
    Acushnet Holdings
    1.88x 23.66x $620.5M $56.2M
    YYAI
    Connexa Sports Technologies
    0.56x -- $361.5K -$1.4M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?

Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…

Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…

Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?

Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x

Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 25

Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.

Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 25

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.

Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 25

Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 15.37% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock