FNB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comerica has a net margin of 28.31% compared to F N B's net margin of 20.75%. F N B's return on equity of 7.4% beat Comerica's return on equity of 11.03%.

F N B has a consensus price target of $16.56, signalling upside risk potential of 28.19%. On the other hand Comerica has an analysts' consensus of $60.30 which suggests that it could grow by 17.22%. Given that F N B has higher upside potential than Comerica, analysts believe F N B is more attractive than Comerica.

F N B has a beta of 0.868, which suggesting that the stock is 13.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comerica has a beta of 0.961, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.883%.

F N B has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Comerica offers a yield of 5.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. F N B pays 38.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Comerica pays out 57.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F N B quarterly revenues are $411.6M, which are smaller than Comerica quarterly revenues of $829M. F N B's net income of $116.5M is lower than Comerica's net income of $172M. Notably, F N B's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.25x while Comerica's PE ratio is 9.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F N B is 2.93x versus 2.09x for Comerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

East West Bancorp has a net margin of 28.31% compared to F N B's net margin of 44.18%. F N B's return on equity of 7.4% beat East West Bancorp's return on equity of 15.93%.

F N B has a consensus price target of $16.56, signalling upside risk potential of 28.19%. On the other hand East West Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $105.75 which suggests that it could grow by 33.51%. Given that East West Bancorp has higher upside potential than F N B, analysts believe East West Bancorp is more attractive than F N B.

F N B has a beta of 0.868, which suggesting that the stock is 13.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison East West Bancorp has a beta of 1.087, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.723%.

F N B has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. East West Bancorp offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. F N B pays 38.07% of its earnings as a dividend. East West Bancorp pays out 26.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F N B quarterly revenues are $411.6M, which are smaller than East West Bancorp quarterly revenues of $663.5M. F N B's net income of $116.5M is lower than East West Bancorp's net income of $293.1M. Notably, F N B's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.25x while East West Bancorp's PE ratio is 9.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F N B is 2.93x versus 4.32x for East West Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hanmi Financial has a net margin of 28.31% compared to F N B's net margin of 29.1%. F N B's return on equity of 7.4% beat Hanmi Financial's return on equity of 8.69%.

F N B has a consensus price target of $16.56, signalling upside risk potential of 28.19%. On the other hand Hanmi Financial has an analysts' consensus of $26.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.67%. Given that F N B has higher upside potential than Hanmi Financial, analysts believe F N B is more attractive than Hanmi Financial.

F N B has a beta of 0.868, which suggesting that the stock is 13.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hanmi Financial has a beta of 0.679, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.105%.

F N B has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Hanmi Financial offers a yield of 4.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. F N B pays 38.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Hanmi Financial pays out 48.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F N B quarterly revenues are $411.6M, which are larger than Hanmi Financial quarterly revenues of $60.8M. F N B's net income of $116.5M is higher than Hanmi Financial's net income of $17.7M. Notably, F N B's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.25x while Hanmi Financial's PE ratio is 10.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F N B is 2.93x versus 2.90x for Hanmi Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trustmark has a net margin of 28.31% compared to F N B's net margin of 33.29%. F N B's return on equity of 7.4% beat Trustmark's return on equity of 12.17%.

F N B has a consensus price target of $16.56, signalling upside risk potential of 28.19%. On the other hand Trustmark has an analysts' consensus of $41.20 which suggests that it could grow by 21.89%. Given that F N B has higher upside potential than Trustmark, analysts believe F N B is more attractive than Trustmark.

F N B has a beta of 0.868, which suggesting that the stock is 13.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trustmark has a beta of 0.671, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.899%.

F N B has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Trustmark offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. F N B pays 38.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Trustmark pays out 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F N B quarterly revenues are $411.6M, which are larger than Trustmark quarterly revenues of $169.2M. F N B's net income of $116.5M is higher than Trustmark's net income of $56.3M. Notably, F N B's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.25x while Trustmark's PE ratio is 9.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F N B is 2.93x versus 4.41x for Trustmark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.