FICO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 24.04%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,238.08, signalling upside risk potential of 10.41%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $311.94 which suggests that it could fall by -3.31%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.634% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.48%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 87.30x while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 33.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 27.39x versus 6.93x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of -4.72%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,238.08, signalling upside risk potential of 10.41%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.48 which suggests that it could grow by 229.83%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.634% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.643%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 87.30x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 27.39x versus 0.67x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ncino has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of -13.16%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Ncino's return on equity of -3.51%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,238.08, signalling upside risk potential of 10.41%. On the other hand Ncino has an analysts' consensus of $26.21 which suggests that it could grow by 1.57%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than Ncino, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than Ncino.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.634% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ncino has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ncino offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ncino pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are larger than Ncino quarterly revenues of $141.4M. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is higher than Ncino's net income of -$18.6M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 87.30x while Ncino's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 27.39x versus 5.50x for Ncino. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paycom Software has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 26.28%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Paycom Software's return on equity of 25.86%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,238.08, signalling upside risk potential of 10.41%. On the other hand Paycom Software has an analysts' consensus of $237.31 which suggests that it could fall by -8.97%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than Paycom Software, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than Paycom Software.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.634% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paycom Software has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.588%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paycom Software offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software pays out 16.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are smaller than Paycom Software quarterly revenues of $530.5M. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is higher than Paycom Software's net income of $139.4M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 87.30x while Paycom Software's PE ratio is 37.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 27.39x versus 7.67x for Paycom Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.