FBK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 11.42% compared to FB Financial's net margin of 31.58%. FB Financial's return on equity of 7.29% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.79%.

FB Financial has a consensus price target of $58.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.56%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $28.25 which suggests that it could grow by 15.7%. Given that Bar Harbor Bankshares has higher upside potential than FB Financial, analysts believe Bar Harbor Bankshares is more attractive than FB Financial.

FB Financial has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.67% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.497%.

FB Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. FB Financial pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 36.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FB Financial quarterly revenues are $89.5M, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $38.6M. FB Financial's net income of $10.2M is lower than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $12.2M. Notably, FB Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.57x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 10.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FB Financial is 5.49x versus 3.06x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cadence Bank has a net margin of 11.42% compared to FB Financial's net margin of 30.5%. FB Financial's return on equity of 7.29% beat Cadence Bank's return on equity of 12.69%.

FB Financial has a consensus price target of $58.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.56%. On the other hand Cadence Bank has an analysts' consensus of $40.86 which suggests that it could grow by 18.48%. Given that Cadence Bank has higher upside potential than FB Financial, analysts believe Cadence Bank is more attractive than FB Financial.

FB Financial has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.67% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Bank has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.992%.

FB Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Cadence Bank offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. FB Financial pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Bank pays out 33.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FB Financial quarterly revenues are $89.5M, which are smaller than Cadence Bank quarterly revenues of $447.4M. FB Financial's net income of $10.2M is lower than Cadence Bank's net income of $136.4M. Notably, FB Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.57x while Cadence Bank's PE ratio is 9.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FB Financial is 5.49x versus 4.67x for Cadence Bank. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Independent Bank has a net margin of 11.42% compared to FB Financial's net margin of 24.59%. FB Financial's return on equity of 7.29% beat Independent Bank's return on equity of 6.76%.

FB Financial has a consensus price target of $58.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.56%. On the other hand Independent Bank has an analysts' consensus of $59.50 which suggests that it could grow by 19.62%. Given that Independent Bank has higher upside potential than FB Financial, analysts believe Independent Bank is more attractive than FB Financial.

FB Financial has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.67% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Independent Bank has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.077%.

FB Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Independent Bank offers a yield of 3.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. FB Financial pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Independent Bank pays out 40.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FB Financial quarterly revenues are $89.5M, which are smaller than Independent Bank quarterly revenues of $174.6M. FB Financial's net income of $10.2M is lower than Independent Bank's net income of $42.9M. Notably, FB Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.57x while Independent Bank's PE ratio is 14.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FB Financial is 5.49x versus 4.07x for Independent Bank. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Renasant has a net margin of 11.42% compared to FB Financial's net margin of 43.4%. FB Financial's return on equity of 7.29% beat Renasant's return on equity of 7.54%.

FB Financial has a consensus price target of $58.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.56%. On the other hand Renasant has an analysts' consensus of $41.17 which suggests that it could grow by 15.02%. Given that Renasant has higher upside potential than FB Financial, analysts believe Renasant is more attractive than FB Financial.

FB Financial has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.67% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renasant has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.294%.

FB Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Renasant offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. FB Financial pays 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Renasant pays out 34.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FB Financial quarterly revenues are $89.5M, which are smaller than Renasant quarterly revenues of $166.9M. FB Financial's net income of $10.2M is lower than Renasant's net income of $72.5M. Notably, FB Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.57x while Renasant's PE ratio is 11.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FB Financial is 5.49x versus 3.23x for Renasant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.