CVNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CarMax has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Carvana's net margin of 1.5%. Carvana's return on equity of 97.13% beat CarMax's return on equity of 8.11%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $255.31, signalling upside risk potential of 20.46%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $83.88 which suggests that it could grow by 28.95%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Carvana, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Carvana.

Carvana has a beta of 3.608, which suggesting that the stock is 260.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.583, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.344%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6B. Carvana's net income of $79M is lower than CarMax's net income of $89.9M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 135.00x while CarMax's PE ratio is 20.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 2.38x versus 0.39x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Carvana's net margin of -42.85%. Carvana's return on equity of 97.13% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $255.31, signalling upside risk potential of 20.46%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.30 which suggests that it could grow by 25.87%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Carvana, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Carvana.

Carvana has a beta of 3.608, which suggesting that the stock is 260.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Carvana's net income of $79M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 135.00x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 2.38x versus 2.31x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Carvana's net margin of 9.17%. Carvana's return on equity of 97.13% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $255.31, signalling upside risk potential of 20.46%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $299.30 which suggests that it could grow by 29.55%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Carvana, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Carvana.

Carvana has a beta of 3.608, which suggesting that the stock is 260.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Carvana's net income of $79M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 135.00x while Tesla's PE ratio is 116.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 2.38x versus 8.52x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wayfair has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Carvana's net margin of -4.1%. Carvana's return on equity of 97.13% beat Wayfair's return on equity of --.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $255.31, signalling upside risk potential of 20.46%. On the other hand Wayfair has an analysts' consensus of $49.07 which suggests that it could grow by 80.88%. Given that Wayfair has higher upside potential than Carvana, analysts believe Wayfair is more attractive than Carvana.

Carvana has a beta of 3.608, which suggesting that the stock is 260.789% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wayfair has a beta of 3.722, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 272.173%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wayfair offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wayfair pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Wayfair quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Carvana's net income of $79M is higher than Wayfair's net income of -$128M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 135.00x while Wayfair's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 2.38x versus 0.28x for Wayfair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.