CUBE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

National Health Investors has a net margin of 32.67% compared to CubeSmart's net margin of 38.26%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 13.34% beat National Health Investors's return on equity of 10.68%.

CubeSmart has a consensus price target of $45.69, signalling upside risk potential of 4.6%. On the other hand National Health Investors has an analysts' consensus of $80.86 which suggests that it could grow by 7%. Given that National Health Investors has higher upside potential than CubeSmart, analysts believe National Health Investors is more attractive than CubeSmart.

CubeSmart has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.048000000000004% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Health Investors has a beta of 0.776, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.371%.

CubeSmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. National Health Investors offers a yield of 4.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. CubeSmart pays 118.05% of its earnings as a dividend. National Health Investors pays out 113.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CubeSmart quarterly revenues are $273M, which are larger than National Health Investors quarterly revenues of $89.3M. CubeSmart's net income of $89.2M is higher than National Health Investors's net income of $34.2M. Notably, CubeSmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.00x while National Health Investors's PE ratio is 23.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CubeSmart is 9.23x versus 9.80x for National Health Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Public Storage has a net margin of 32.67% compared to CubeSmart's net margin of 34.47%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 13.34% beat Public Storage's return on equity of 20.09%.

CubeSmart has a consensus price target of $45.69, signalling upside risk potential of 4.6%. On the other hand Public Storage has an analysts' consensus of $331.67 which suggests that it could grow by 7.28%. Given that Public Storage has higher upside potential than CubeSmart, analysts believe Public Storage is more attractive than CubeSmart.

CubeSmart has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.048000000000004% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Public Storage has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.661%.

CubeSmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Public Storage offers a yield of 3.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. CubeSmart pays 118.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Public Storage pays out 111.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CubeSmart quarterly revenues are $273M, which are smaller than Public Storage quarterly revenues of $1.2B. CubeSmart's net income of $89.2M is lower than Public Storage's net income of $407.8M. Notably, CubeSmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.00x while Public Storage's PE ratio is 30.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CubeSmart is 9.23x versus 11.52x for Public Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regency Centers has a net margin of 32.67% compared to CubeSmart's net margin of 28.77%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 13.34% beat Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.74%.

CubeSmart has a consensus price target of $45.69, signalling upside risk potential of 4.6%. On the other hand Regency Centers has an analysts' consensus of $79.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.02%. Given that Regency Centers has higher upside potential than CubeSmart, analysts believe Regency Centers is more attractive than CubeSmart.

CubeSmart has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.048000000000004% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regency Centers has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.729%.

CubeSmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Regency Centers offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. CubeSmart pays 118.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Regency Centers pays out 125.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CubeSmart quarterly revenues are $273M, which are smaller than Regency Centers quarterly revenues of $380.9M. CubeSmart's net income of $89.2M is lower than Regency Centers's net income of $109.6M. Notably, CubeSmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.00x while Regency Centers's PE ratio is 34.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CubeSmart is 9.23x versus 9.15x for Regency Centers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Welltower has a net margin of 32.67% compared to CubeSmart's net margin of 10.8%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 13.34% beat Welltower's return on equity of 3.46%.

CubeSmart has a consensus price target of $45.69, signalling upside risk potential of 4.6%. On the other hand Welltower has an analysts' consensus of $166.35 which suggests that it could grow by 11.86%. Given that Welltower has higher upside potential than CubeSmart, analysts believe Welltower is more attractive than CubeSmart.

CubeSmart has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.048000000000004% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Welltower has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.67%.

CubeSmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Welltower offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. CubeSmart pays 118.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Welltower pays out 162.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CubeSmart quarterly revenues are $273M, which are smaller than Welltower quarterly revenues of $2.4B. CubeSmart's net income of $89.2M is lower than Welltower's net income of $258M. Notably, CubeSmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.00x while Welltower's PE ratio is 85.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CubeSmart is 9.23x versus 11.10x for Welltower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.