CUBE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

National Health Investors has a net margin of 38.06% compared to CubeSmart's net margin of 50.43%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 13.57% beat National Health Investors's return on equity of 10.72%.

CubeSmart has a consensus price target of $45.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.95%. On the other hand National Health Investors has an analysts' consensus of $80.86 which suggests that it could grow by 6.86%. Given that CubeSmart has higher upside potential than National Health Investors, analysts believe CubeSmart is more attractive than National Health Investors.

CubeSmart has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.048000000000004% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Health Investors has a beta of 0.776, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.371%.

CubeSmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.07%. National Health Investors offers a yield of 4.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. CubeSmart pays 118.05% of its earnings as a dividend. National Health Investors pays out 113.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CubeSmart quarterly revenues are $267.7M, which are larger than National Health Investors quarterly revenues of $85.8M. CubeSmart's net income of $101.9M is higher than National Health Investors's net income of $43.2M. Notably, CubeSmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.78x while National Health Investors's PE ratio is 24.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CubeSmart is 8.66x versus 9.96x for National Health Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Public Storage has a net margin of 38.06% compared to CubeSmart's net margin of 52.2%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 13.57% beat Public Storage's return on equity of 20.94%.

CubeSmart has a consensus price target of $45.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.95%. On the other hand Public Storage has an analysts' consensus of $328.84 which suggests that it could grow by 9.46%. Given that CubeSmart has higher upside potential than Public Storage, analysts believe CubeSmart is more attractive than Public Storage.

CubeSmart has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.048000000000004% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Public Storage has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.661%.

CubeSmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.07%. Public Storage offers a yield of 3.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. CubeSmart pays 118.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Public Storage pays out 111.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CubeSmart quarterly revenues are $267.7M, which are smaller than Public Storage quarterly revenues of $1.2B. CubeSmart's net income of $101.9M is lower than Public Storage's net income of $614.6M. Notably, CubeSmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.78x while Public Storage's PE ratio is 28.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CubeSmart is 8.66x versus 11.26x for Public Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regency Centers has a net margin of 38.06% compared to CubeSmart's net margin of 23.21%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 13.57% beat Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.69%.

CubeSmart has a consensus price target of $45.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.95%. On the other hand Regency Centers has an analysts' consensus of $79.42 which suggests that it could grow by 10.03%. Given that CubeSmart has higher upside potential than Regency Centers, analysts believe CubeSmart is more attractive than Regency Centers.

CubeSmart has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.048000000000004% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regency Centers has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.729%.

CubeSmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.07%. Regency Centers offers a yield of 3.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. CubeSmart pays 118.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Regency Centers pays out 125.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CubeSmart quarterly revenues are $267.7M, which are smaller than Regency Centers quarterly revenues of $372.5M. CubeSmart's net income of $101.9M is higher than Regency Centers's net income of $86.5M. Notably, CubeSmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.78x while Regency Centers's PE ratio is 34.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CubeSmart is 8.66x versus 9.09x for Regency Centers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Welltower has a net margin of 38.06% compared to CubeSmart's net margin of 5.41%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 13.57% beat Welltower's return on equity of 3.21%.

CubeSmart has a consensus price target of $45.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.95%. On the other hand Welltower has an analysts' consensus of $165.74 which suggests that it could grow by 8.2%. Given that CubeSmart has higher upside potential than Welltower, analysts believe CubeSmart is more attractive than Welltower.

CubeSmart has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.048000000000004% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Welltower has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.67%.

CubeSmart has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.07%. Welltower offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. CubeSmart pays 118.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Welltower pays out 162.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CubeSmart quarterly revenues are $267.7M, which are smaller than Welltower quarterly revenues of $2.2B. CubeSmart's net income of $101.9M is lower than Welltower's net income of $120M. Notably, CubeSmart's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.78x while Welltower's PE ratio is 97.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CubeSmart is 8.66x versus 11.83x for Welltower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.