CNK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fox has a net margin of 20.37% compared to Cinemark Holdings's net margin of 23.2%. Cinemark Holdings's return on equity of 62.21% beat Fox's return on equity of 17.53%.

Cinemark Holdings has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 9.78%. On the other hand Fox has an analysts' consensus of $48.16 which suggests that it could fall by -1.69%. Given that Cinemark Holdings has higher upside potential than Fox, analysts believe Cinemark Holdings is more attractive than Fox.

Cinemark Holdings has a beta of 2.405, which suggesting that the stock is 140.499% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fox has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.378%.

Cinemark Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fox offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Cinemark Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fox pays out 18.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Fox's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cinemark Holdings quarterly revenues are $921.8M, which are smaller than Fox quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Cinemark Holdings's net income of $187.8M is lower than Fox's net income of $827M. Notably, Cinemark Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.98x while Fox's PE ratio is 11.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings is 1.66x versus 1.61x for Fox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of 20.37% compared to Cinemark Holdings's net margin of 24.06%. Cinemark Holdings's return on equity of 62.21% beat Netflix's return on equity of 35.73%.

Cinemark Holdings has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 9.78%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $841.70 which suggests that it could fall by -5.08%. Given that Cinemark Holdings has higher upside potential than Netflix, analysts believe Cinemark Holdings is more attractive than Netflix.

Cinemark Holdings has a beta of 2.405, which suggesting that the stock is 140.499% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.567%.

Cinemark Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cinemark Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cinemark Holdings quarterly revenues are $921.8M, which are smaller than Netflix quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Cinemark Holdings's net income of $187.8M is lower than Netflix's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Cinemark Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.98x while Netflix's PE ratio is 50.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings is 1.66x versus 10.40x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of 20.37% compared to Cinemark Holdings's net margin of 0.02%. Cinemark Holdings's return on equity of 62.21% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -26.78%.

Cinemark Holdings has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 9.78%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.71 which suggests that it could grow by 20.1%. Given that Paramount Global has higher upside potential than Cinemark Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Global is more attractive than Cinemark Holdings.

Cinemark Holdings has a beta of 2.405, which suggesting that the stock is 140.499% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.701, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.127%.

Cinemark Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Cinemark Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -73.52% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cinemark Holdings quarterly revenues are $921.8M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Cinemark Holdings's net income of $187.8M is higher than Paramount Global's net income of $1M. Notably, Cinemark Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.98x while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings is 1.66x versus 0.24x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reading International has a net margin of 20.37% compared to Cinemark Holdings's net margin of -11.51%. Cinemark Holdings's return on equity of 62.21% beat Reading International's return on equity of -195.8%.

Cinemark Holdings has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 9.78%. On the other hand Reading International has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 26.81%. Given that Reading International has higher upside potential than Cinemark Holdings, analysts believe Reading International is more attractive than Cinemark Holdings.

Cinemark Holdings has a beta of 2.405, which suggesting that the stock is 140.499% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reading International has a beta of 1.606, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.633%.

Cinemark Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reading International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cinemark Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reading International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cinemark Holdings quarterly revenues are $921.8M, which are larger than Reading International quarterly revenues of $60.1M. Cinemark Holdings's net income of $187.8M is higher than Reading International's net income of -$6.9M. Notably, Cinemark Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.98x while Reading International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings is 1.66x versus 0.16x for Reading International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.