CHH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyatt Hotels has a net margin of 19.45% compared to Choice Hotels International's net margin of 1.16%. Choice Hotels International's return on equity of 5278.63% beat Hyatt Hotels's return on equity of 21.12%.

Choice Hotels International has a consensus price target of $134.32, signalling upside risk potential of 3.97%. On the other hand Hyatt Hotels has an analysts' consensus of $142.96 which suggests that it could grow by 16.25%. Given that Hyatt Hotels has higher upside potential than Choice Hotels International, analysts believe Hyatt Hotels is more attractive than Choice Hotels International.

Choice Hotels International has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.244% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyatt Hotels has a beta of 1.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.35%.

Choice Hotels International has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Hyatt Hotels offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Choice Hotels International pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyatt Hotels pays out 4.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Choice Hotels International quarterly revenues are $389.8M, which are smaller than Hyatt Hotels quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Choice Hotels International's net income of $75.8M is higher than Hyatt Hotels's net income of $20M. Notably, Choice Hotels International's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.74x while Hyatt Hotels's PE ratio is 15.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Choice Hotels International is 3.92x versus 1.86x for Hyatt Hotels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hilton Grand Vacations has a net margin of 19.45% compared to Choice Hotels International's net margin of -1.48%. Choice Hotels International's return on equity of 5278.63% beat Hilton Grand Vacations's return on equity of 1.73%.

Choice Hotels International has a consensus price target of $134.32, signalling upside risk potential of 3.97%. On the other hand Hilton Grand Vacations has an analysts' consensus of $47.72 which suggests that it could grow by 22.49%. Given that Hilton Grand Vacations has higher upside potential than Choice Hotels International, analysts believe Hilton Grand Vacations is more attractive than Choice Hotels International.

Choice Hotels International has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.244% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hilton Grand Vacations has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.451%.

Choice Hotels International has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Hilton Grand Vacations offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Choice Hotels International pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilton Grand Vacations pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Choice Hotels International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Choice Hotels International quarterly revenues are $389.8M, which are smaller than Hilton Grand Vacations quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Choice Hotels International's net income of $75.8M is higher than Hilton Grand Vacations's net income of -$17M. Notably, Choice Hotels International's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.74x while Hilton Grand Vacations's PE ratio is 121.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Choice Hotels International is 3.92x versus 0.79x for Hilton Grand Vacations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a net margin of 19.45% compared to Choice Hotels International's net margin of 11.13%. Choice Hotels International's return on equity of 5278.63% beat Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of --.

Choice Hotels International has a consensus price target of $134.32, signalling upside risk potential of 3.97%. On the other hand Hilton Worldwide Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $246.63 which suggests that it could grow by 2.38%. Given that Choice Hotels International has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Choice Hotels International is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Choice Hotels International has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.244% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.939%.

Choice Hotels International has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings offers a yield of 0.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Choice Hotels International pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays out 9.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Choice Hotels International quarterly revenues are $389.8M, which are smaller than Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Choice Hotels International's net income of $75.8M is lower than Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $300M. Notably, Choice Hotels International's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.74x while Hilton Worldwide Holdings's PE ratio is 38.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Choice Hotels International is 3.92x versus 5.27x for Hilton Worldwide Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marriott International has a net margin of 19.45% compared to Choice Hotels International's net margin of 7.08%. Choice Hotels International's return on equity of 5278.63% beat Marriott International's return on equity of --.

Choice Hotels International has a consensus price target of $134.32, signalling upside risk potential of 3.97%. On the other hand Marriott International has an analysts' consensus of $269.88 which suggests that it could grow by 8.18%. Given that Marriott International has higher upside potential than Choice Hotels International, analysts believe Marriott International is more attractive than Choice Hotels International.

Choice Hotels International has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.244% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marriott International has a beta of 1.387, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.664%.

Choice Hotels International has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Marriott International offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Choice Hotels International pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott International pays out 28.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Choice Hotels International quarterly revenues are $389.8M, which are smaller than Marriott International quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Choice Hotels International's net income of $75.8M is lower than Marriott International's net income of $455M. Notably, Choice Hotels International's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.74x while Marriott International's PE ratio is 29.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Choice Hotels International is 3.92x versus 2.84x for Marriott International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.