CBL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Medical REIT has a net margin of 6.2% compared to CBL & Associates Properties's net margin of 10.29%. CBL & Associates Properties's return on equity of 22.44% beat Global Medical REIT's return on equity of 1.4%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.03%. On the other hand Global Medical REIT has an analysts' consensus of $10.16 which suggests that it could grow by 46.34%. Given that CBL & Associates Properties has higher upside potential than Global Medical REIT, analysts believe CBL & Associates Properties is more attractive than Global Medical REIT.

CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Medical REIT has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.918%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.58%. Global Medical REIT offers a yield of 12.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. CBL & Associates Properties pays 85.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Medical REIT pays out 990.35% of its earnings as a dividend. CBL & Associates Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Medical REIT's is not.

CBL & Associates Properties quarterly revenues are $141.8M, which are larger than Global Medical REIT quarterly revenues of $34.6M. CBL & Associates Properties's net income of $8.8M is higher than Global Medical REIT's net income of $3.6M. Notably, CBL & Associates Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.31x while Global Medical REIT's PE ratio is 231.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBL & Associates Properties is 1.42x versus 3.33x for Global Medical REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Getty Realty has a net margin of 6.2% compared to CBL & Associates Properties's net margin of 28.26%. CBL & Associates Properties's return on equity of 22.44% beat Getty Realty's return on equity of 7.22%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.03%. On the other hand Getty Realty has an analysts' consensus of $32.86 which suggests that it could grow by 16.1%. Given that CBL & Associates Properties has higher upside potential than Getty Realty, analysts believe CBL & Associates Properties is more attractive than Getty Realty.

CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Getty Realty has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.011%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.58%. Getty Realty offers a yield of 6.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. CBL & Associates Properties pays 85.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Getty Realty pays out 141.01% of its earnings as a dividend. CBL & Associates Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Getty Realty's is not.

CBL & Associates Properties quarterly revenues are $141.8M, which are larger than Getty Realty quarterly revenues of $52.3M. CBL & Associates Properties's net income of $8.8M is lower than Getty Realty's net income of $14.8M. Notably, CBL & Associates Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.31x while Getty Realty's PE ratio is 23.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBL & Associates Properties is 1.42x versus 7.51x for Getty Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimco Realty has a net margin of 6.2% compared to CBL & Associates Properties's net margin of 24.75%. CBL & Associates Properties's return on equity of 22.44% beat Kimco Realty's return on equity of 5.14%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.03%. On the other hand Kimco Realty has an analysts' consensus of $24.04 which suggests that it could grow by 16.23%. Given that CBL & Associates Properties has higher upside potential than Kimco Realty, analysts believe CBL & Associates Properties is more attractive than Kimco Realty.

CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.264, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.414%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.58%. Kimco Realty offers a yield of 4.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. CBL & Associates Properties pays 85.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimco Realty pays out 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. CBL & Associates Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kimco Realty's is not.

CBL & Associates Properties quarterly revenues are $141.8M, which are smaller than Kimco Realty quarterly revenues of $536.6M. CBL & Associates Properties's net income of $8.8M is lower than Kimco Realty's net income of $132.8M. Notably, CBL & Associates Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.31x while Kimco Realty's PE ratio is 26.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBL & Associates Properties is 1.42x versus 6.73x for Kimco Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 6.2% compared to CBL & Associates Properties's net margin of 4.81%. CBL & Associates Properties's return on equity of 22.44% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.19%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.03%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.86 which suggests that it could grow by 38.57%. Given that CBL & Associates Properties has higher upside potential than Strawberry Fields REIT, analysts believe CBL & Associates Properties is more attractive than Strawberry Fields REIT.

CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CBL & Associates Properties has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.58%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 5.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. CBL & Associates Properties pays 85.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CBL & Associates Properties quarterly revenues are $141.8M, which are larger than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $30.5M. CBL & Associates Properties's net income of $8.8M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.5M. Notably, CBL & Associates Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.31x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBL & Associates Properties is 1.42x versus 0.61x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.