BG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Archer-Daniels Midland has a net margin of 4.45% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of 2.64%. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 10.07% beat Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.82%.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $87.23, signalling upside risk potential of 10.13%. On the other hand Archer-Daniels Midland has an analysts' consensus of $49.73 which suggests that it could grow by 3.92%. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.739% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.691, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.899%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.43%. Archer-Daniels Midland offers a yield of 4.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 33.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Archer-Daniels Midland pays out 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are smaller than Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues of $21.5B. Bunge Global SA's net income of $602M is higher than Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $567M. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.80x while Archer-Daniels Midland's PE ratio is 13.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.21x versus 0.28x for Archer-Daniels Midland. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 4.45% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of --. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 10.07% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $87.23, signalling upside risk potential of 10.13%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.739% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of -0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.656%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.43%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 33.25% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Bunge Global SA's net income of $602M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.80x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.21x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 4.45% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of 3.36%. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 10.07% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $87.23, signalling upside risk potential of 10.13%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $92.38 which suggests that it could grow by 43.4%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Bunge Global SA, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Bunge Global SA.

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.739% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.39100000000001%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.43%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 33.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $700.2M. Bunge Global SA's net income of $602M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.80x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 15.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.21x versus 0.63x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMeWorld has a net margin of 4.45% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of --. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 10.07% beat UMeWorld's return on equity of --.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $87.23, signalling upside risk potential of 10.13%. On the other hand UMeWorld has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than UMeWorld, analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than UMeWorld.

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.739% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMeWorld has a beta of -1.650, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 265.003%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.43%. UMeWorld offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 33.25% of its earnings as a dividend. UMeWorld pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than UMeWorld quarterly revenues of --. Bunge Global SA's net income of $602M is higher than UMeWorld's net income of --. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.80x while UMeWorld's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.21x versus -- for UMeWorld. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.