ALSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of 25.07% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of -2.54%. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 48.56% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $102.50, signalling downside risk potential of -2%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 187.77%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Allison Transmission Holdings, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Allison Transmission Holdings.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.849% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 1.928, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.831%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Allison Transmission Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $766M, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $169.8M. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $192M is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.11x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.86x versus 0.06x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentex has a net margin of 25.07% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of 16.45%. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 48.56% beat Gentex's return on equity of 16.1%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $102.50, signalling downside risk potential of -2%. On the other hand Gentex has an analysts' consensus of $27.83 which suggests that it could grow by 26.49%. Given that Gentex has higher upside potential than Allison Transmission Holdings, analysts believe Gentex is more attractive than Allison Transmission Holdings.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.849% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentex has a beta of 0.852, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.832%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Gentex offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex pays out 27.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $766M, which are larger than Gentex quarterly revenues of $576.8M. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $192M is higher than Gentex's net income of $94.9M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.11x while Gentex's PE ratio is 12.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.86x versus 2.15x for Gentex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 25.07% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of -3528.43%. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 48.56% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $102.50, signalling downside risk potential of -2%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 75.44%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Allison Transmission Holdings, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Allison Transmission Holdings.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.849% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Allison Transmission Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $766M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $192M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.11x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.86x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visteon has a net margin of 25.07% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of 6.96%. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 48.56% beat Visteon's return on equity of 23.53%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $102.50, signalling downside risk potential of -2%. On the other hand Visteon has an analysts' consensus of $94.08 which suggests that it could grow by 9.51%. Given that Visteon has higher upside potential than Allison Transmission Holdings, analysts believe Visteon is more attractive than Allison Transmission Holdings.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.849% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visteon has a beta of 1.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.396%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Visteon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Visteon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Allison Transmission Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $766M, which are smaller than Visteon quarterly revenues of $934M. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $192M is higher than Visteon's net income of $65M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.11x while Visteon's PE ratio is 8.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.86x versus 0.62x for Visteon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.