AGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty has a net margin of 4.57% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of -95.17%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 7.7% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -0.63%.

Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $32.88, signalling upside risk potential of 20.69%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.11 which suggests that it could grow by 98.09%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Alamos Gold, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Alamos Gold.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.205% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Alamos Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Alamos Gold pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold quarterly revenues are $333M, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $3.4M. Alamos Gold's net income of $15.2M is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Alamos Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.94x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold is 8.05x versus 24.83x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 4.57% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of -24.56%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 7.7% beat McEwen Mining's return on equity of -8.85%.

Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $32.88, signalling upside risk potential of 20.69%. On the other hand McEwen Mining has an analysts' consensus of $15.06 which suggests that it could grow by 85.5%. Given that McEwen Mining has higher upside potential than Alamos Gold, analysts believe McEwen Mining is more attractive than Alamos Gold.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.205% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen Mining has a beta of 0.929, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.098%.

Alamos Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. McEwen Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold quarterly revenues are $333M, which are larger than McEwen Mining quarterly revenues of $33.5M. Alamos Gold's net income of $15.2M is higher than McEwen Mining's net income of -$8.2M. Notably, Alamos Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.94x while McEwen Mining's PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold is 8.05x versus 2.37x for McEwen Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rise Gold has a net margin of 4.57% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of --. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 7.7% beat Rise Gold's return on equity of --.

Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $32.88, signalling upside risk potential of 20.69%. On the other hand Rise Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alamos Gold has higher upside potential than Rise Gold, analysts believe Alamos Gold is more attractive than Rise Gold.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.205% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rise Gold has a beta of -1.562, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 256.205%.

Alamos Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. Rise Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Rise Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold quarterly revenues are $333M, which are larger than Rise Gold quarterly revenues of --. Alamos Gold's net income of $15.2M is higher than Rise Gold's net income of -$686.3K. Notably, Alamos Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.94x while Rise Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold is 8.05x versus -- for Rise Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of 4.57% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of --. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 7.7% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $32.88, signalling upside risk potential of 20.69%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of $39.67 which suggests that it could grow by 205.43%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than Alamos Gold, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than Alamos Gold.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.205% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.062%.

Alamos Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold quarterly revenues are $333M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. Alamos Gold's net income of $15.2M is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of -$20.2M. Notably, Alamos Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.94x while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold is 8.05x versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.