ACA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 4.63%. Arcosa's return on equity of 5.41% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 14.75%.

Arcosa has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.12%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Arcosa.

Arcosa has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.365% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.617%.

Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcosa quarterly revenues are $640.4M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $191.2M. Arcosa's net income of $16.6M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.12x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 13.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.86x versus 1.04x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 1.88%. Arcosa's return on equity of 5.41% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of -10.35%.

Arcosa has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.12%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $9.83 which suggests that it could grow by 58.95%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Arcosa.

Arcosa has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.365% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.278%.

Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcosa quarterly revenues are $640.4M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $226.7M. Arcosa's net income of $16.6M is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.12x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.86x versus 0.30x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliant Holdings has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Arcosa's net margin of -116.57%. Arcosa's return on equity of 5.41% beat Reliant Holdings's return on equity of 389.74%.

Arcosa has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.12%. On the other hand Reliant Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arcosa has higher upside potential than Reliant Holdings, analysts believe Arcosa is more attractive than Reliant Holdings.

Arcosa has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.365% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliant Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Reliant Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliant Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcosa quarterly revenues are $640.4M, which are larger than Reliant Holdings quarterly revenues of $898.8K. Arcosa's net income of $16.6M is higher than Reliant Holdings's net income of -$1M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.12x while Reliant Holdings's PE ratio is 1.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.86x versus 0.56x for Reliant Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 10.33%. Arcosa's return on equity of 5.41% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 28.17%.

Arcosa has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.12%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.64%. Given that Arcosa has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Arcosa is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Arcosa has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.365% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.265, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.502%.

Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcosa quarterly revenues are $640.4M, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $593.7M. Arcosa's net income of $16.6M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $61.3M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.12x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 28.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.86x versus 2.48x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.