PAPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Encore Capital Group has a net margin of -13.04% compared to Pineapple Financial's net margin of -84.82%. Pineapple Financial's return on equity of -232.14% beat Encore Capital Group's return on equity of -14.83%.

Pineapple Financial has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1658.71%. On the other hand Encore Capital Group has an analysts' consensus of $59.75 which suggests that it could grow by 81.01%. Given that Pineapple Financial has higher upside potential than Encore Capital Group, analysts believe Pineapple Financial is more attractive than Encore Capital Group.

Pineapple Financial has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Encore Capital Group has a beta of 1.578, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.77%.

Pineapple Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Encore Capital Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pineapple Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Encore Capital Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pineapple Financial quarterly revenues are $4.6M, which are smaller than Encore Capital Group quarterly revenues of $265.6M. Pineapple Financial's net income of -$595.5K is higher than Encore Capital Group's net income of -$225.3M. Notably, Pineapple Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Encore Capital Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pineapple Financial is 0.08x versus 0.61x for Encore Capital Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LM Funding America has a net margin of -13.04% compared to Pineapple Financial's net margin of -490.99%. Pineapple Financial's return on equity of -232.14% beat LM Funding America's return on equity of -32.38%.

Pineapple Financial has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1658.71%. On the other hand LM Funding America has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 255.73%. Given that Pineapple Financial has higher upside potential than LM Funding America, analysts believe Pineapple Financial is more attractive than LM Funding America.

Pineapple Financial has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LM Funding America has a beta of 1.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.857%.

Pineapple Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LM Funding America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pineapple Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LM Funding America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pineapple Financial quarterly revenues are $4.6M, which are larger than LM Funding America quarterly revenues of $956.9K. Pineapple Financial's net income of -$595.5K is higher than LM Funding America's net income of -$4.7M. Notably, Pineapple Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LM Funding America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pineapple Financial is 0.08x versus 0.21x for LM Funding America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Navient has a net margin of -13.04% compared to Pineapple Financial's net margin of 9.56%. Pineapple Financial's return on equity of -232.14% beat Navient's return on equity of 4.81%.

Pineapple Financial has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1658.71%. On the other hand Navient has an analysts' consensus of $12.90 which suggests that it could grow by 12.66%. Given that Pineapple Financial has higher upside potential than Navient, analysts believe Pineapple Financial is more attractive than Navient.

Pineapple Financial has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Navient has a beta of 1.243, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.343%.

Pineapple Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Navient offers a yield of 5.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Pineapple Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Navient pays out 53.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Navient's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pineapple Financial quarterly revenues are $4.6M, which are smaller than Navient quarterly revenues of $251M. Pineapple Financial's net income of -$595.5K is lower than Navient's net income of $24M. Notably, Pineapple Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Navient's PE ratio is 9.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pineapple Financial is 0.08x versus 1.32x for Navient. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of -13.04% compared to Pineapple Financial's net margin of 13.4%. Pineapple Financial's return on equity of -232.14% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 20.14%.

Pineapple Financial has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1658.71%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $85.24 which suggests that it could grow by 38.78%. Given that Pineapple Financial has higher upside potential than PayPal Holdings, analysts believe Pineapple Financial is more attractive than PayPal Holdings.

Pineapple Financial has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.467%.

Pineapple Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pineapple Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pineapple Financial quarterly revenues are $4.6M, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $8.4B. Pineapple Financial's net income of -$595.5K is lower than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Pineapple Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 15.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pineapple Financial is 0.08x versus 2.01x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.