FSP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brandywine Realty Trust has a net margin of -52.63% compared to Franklin Street Properties's net margin of -125.37%. Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -5.84% beat Brandywine Realty Trust's return on equity of -23.61%.

Franklin Street Properties has a consensus price target of $1.75, signalling upside risk potential of 5.26%. On the other hand Brandywine Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.83%. Given that Franklin Street Properties has higher upside potential than Brandywine Realty Trust, analysts believe Franklin Street Properties is more attractive than Brandywine Realty Trust.

Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.822, which suggesting that the stock is 17.841% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brandywine Realty Trust has a beta of 1.355, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.466%.

Franklin Street Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Brandywine Realty Trust offers a yield of 10.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Franklin Street Properties pays -8.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Brandywine Realty Trust pays out -63.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues are $29.7M, which are smaller than Brandywine Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $131.8M. Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$15.6M is higher than Brandywine Realty Trust's net income of -$165.2M. Notably, Franklin Street Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Brandywine Realty Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Street Properties is 1.55x versus 1.89x for Brandywine Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BXP has a net margin of -52.63% compared to Franklin Street Properties's net margin of 9.73%. Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -5.84% beat BXP's return on equity of 4.42%.

Franklin Street Properties has a consensus price target of $1.75, signalling upside risk potential of 5.26%. On the other hand BXP has an analysts' consensus of $84.58 which suggests that it could grow by 11.1%. Given that BXP has higher upside potential than Franklin Street Properties, analysts believe BXP is more attractive than Franklin Street Properties.

Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.822, which suggesting that the stock is 17.841% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BXP has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17%.

Franklin Street Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. BXP offers a yield of 5.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Franklin Street Properties pays -8.59% of its earnings as a dividend. BXP pays out 361.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues are $29.7M, which are smaller than BXP quarterly revenues of $859.2M. Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$15.6M is lower than BXP's net income of $83.6M. Notably, Franklin Street Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BXP's PE ratio is 32.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Street Properties is 1.55x versus 3.55x for BXP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Creative Media & Community Trust has a net margin of -52.63% compared to Franklin Street Properties's net margin of -36.29%. Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -5.84% beat Creative Media & Community Trust's return on equity of -6.37%.

Franklin Street Properties has a consensus price target of $1.75, signalling upside risk potential of 5.26%. On the other hand Creative Media & Community Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2696.71%. Given that Creative Media & Community Trust has higher upside potential than Franklin Street Properties, analysts believe Creative Media & Community Trust is more attractive than Franklin Street Properties.

Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.822, which suggesting that the stock is 17.841% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Creative Media & Community Trust has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.551%.

Franklin Street Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Creative Media & Community Trust offers a yield of 237.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Franklin Street Properties pays -8.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Creative Media & Community Trust pays out -76.79% of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues are $29.7M, which are larger than Creative Media & Community Trust quarterly revenues of $28.6M. Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$15.6M is lower than Creative Media & Community Trust's net income of -$10.4M. Notably, Franklin Street Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Creative Media & Community Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Street Properties is 1.55x versus 0.03x for Creative Media & Community Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Douglas Emmett has a net margin of -52.63% compared to Franklin Street Properties's net margin of 1.84%. Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -5.84% beat Douglas Emmett's return on equity of -0.42%.

Franklin Street Properties has a consensus price target of $1.75, signalling upside risk potential of 5.26%. On the other hand Douglas Emmett has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -2.18%. Given that Franklin Street Properties has higher upside potential than Douglas Emmett, analysts believe Franklin Street Properties is more attractive than Douglas Emmett.

Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.822, which suggesting that the stock is 17.841% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Douglas Emmett has a beta of 1.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.387%.

Franklin Street Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Douglas Emmett offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Franklin Street Properties pays -8.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Emmett pays out -304.16% of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues are $29.7M, which are smaller than Douglas Emmett quarterly revenues of $250.8M. Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$15.6M is lower than Douglas Emmett's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Franklin Street Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Douglas Emmett's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Street Properties is 1.55x versus 3.14x for Douglas Emmett. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.