CVR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hillenbrand has a net margin of 5.54% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine's net margin of -5.71%. Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72% beat Hillenbrand's return on equity of -18.26%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hillenbrand has an analysts' consensus of $31.25 which suggests that it could grow by 57.19%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 87.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.559, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.94%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Hillenbrand offers a yield of 4.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Hillenbrand pays out -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend.

Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues are $7.2M, which are smaller than Hillenbrand quarterly revenues of $715.9M. Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K is higher than Hillenbrand's net income of -$40.9M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hillenbrand's PE ratio is 34.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine is 0.43x versus 0.46x for Hillenbrand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enpro has a net margin of 5.54% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine's net margin of 8.97%. Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72% beat Enpro's return on equity of 5.9%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enpro has an analysts' consensus of $212.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.46%. Given that Enpro has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Enpro is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 87.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enpro has a beta of 1.512, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.174%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Enpro offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro pays out 34.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Enpro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues are $7.2M, which are smaller than Enpro quarterly revenues of $273.2M. Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K is lower than Enpro's net income of $24.5M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enpro's PE ratio is 45.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine is 0.43x versus 3.62x for Enpro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of 5.54% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine's net margin of 2.05%. Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -15.3%. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 87.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.575%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues are $7.2M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $405.4M. Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 7.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine is 0.43x versus 0.15x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of 5.54% compared to Chicago Rivet & Machine's net margin of -0.71%. Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $31.95 which suggests that it could grow by 4.02%. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 87.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues are $7.2M, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $549.7M. Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K is higher than Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Chicago Rivet & Machine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chicago Rivet & Machine is 0.43x versus 1.56x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.