Why Did Forge Global Stock Go Down?
Shares of Forge Global (NYSE:FRGE), a platform that allows accredited…
Sell
49
COE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$19.55
Seasonality move
:
2%
Day range:
$19.00 - $19.74
52-week range:
$6.33 - $25.70
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
2.19x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
7.4K
Avg. volume:
7.2K
1-year change:
182.79%
Market cap:
$112.7M
Revenue:
$50.7M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.93
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COE
51 Talk Online Education Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FEDU
Four Seasons Education (Cayman)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IH
iHuman
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SISI
Shineco
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TANH
Tantech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YQ
17 Education & Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COE
51 Talk Online Education Group
|
$19.23 | -- | $112.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.19x |
|
FEDU
Four Seasons Education (Cayman)
|
$9.88 | -- | $20.9M | 84.93x | $2.30 | 23.28% | 0.85x |
|
IH
iHuman
|
$2.31 | -- | $119M | 9.11x | $0.10 | 0% | 0.97x |
|
SISI
Shineco
|
$0.74 | -- | $15.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.04x |
|
TANH
Tantech Holdings
|
$2.15 | -- | $2.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
YQ
17 Education & Technology Group
|
$1.96 | -- | $15.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.60x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COE
51 Talk Online Education Group
|
-- | -0.697 | -- | 0.51x |
|
FEDU
Four Seasons Education (Cayman)
|
13.04% | 0.144 | 26.63% | 1.42x |
|
IH
iHuman
|
-- | 0.107 | 0.34% | 2.73x |
|
SISI
Shineco
|
38.74% | 2.932 | 48.7% | 0.20x |
|
TANH
Tantech Holdings
|
-- | 2.793 | -- | -- |
|
YQ
17 Education & Technology Group
|
-- | 1.598 | -- | 2.83x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COE
51 Talk Online Education Group
|
$12.6M | -$858K | -- | -- | -5.29% | -- |
|
FEDU
Four Seasons Education (Cayman)
|
-- | -- | 0.38% | 0.38% | -- | -- |
|
IH
iHuman
|
$21.7M | $2.1M | 10.59% | 10.59% | 6.41% | -- |
|
SISI
Shineco
|
-$14.1K | -$3.8M | -61.2% | -99.67% | -9475.18% | -$414.3K |
|
TANH
Tantech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YQ
17 Education & Technology Group
|
$5.1M | -$3M | -47.86% | -47.86% | -36.3% | -- |
51 Talk Online Education Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns COE or FEDU?
Four Seasons Education (Cayman) has a net margin of -8.49% compared to 51 Talk Online Education Group's net margin of --. 51 Talk Online Education Group's return on equity of -- beat Four Seasons Education (Cayman)'s return on equity of 0.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COE51 Talk Online Education Group77.51% -- -$14.7M FEDUFour Seasons Education (Cayman)-- -- $73.5M -
What do Analysts Say About COE or FEDU?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 86.92%. On the other hand Four Seasons Education (Cayman) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 816.25%. Given that Four Seasons Education (Cayman) has higher upside potential than 51 Talk Online Education Group, analysts believe Four Seasons Education (Cayman) is more attractive than 51 Talk Online Education Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COE51 Talk Online Education Group0 0 0 FEDUFour Seasons Education (Cayman)0 0 0 -
Is COE or FEDU More Risky?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a beta of -0.167, which suggesting that the stock is 116.682% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Four Seasons Education (Cayman) has a beta of -0.135, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.549%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COE or FEDU?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Four Seasons Education (Cayman) offers a yield of 23.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.30 per share. 51 Talk Online Education Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Four Seasons Education (Cayman) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COE or FEDU?
51 Talk Online Education Group quarterly revenues are $16.2M, which are larger than Four Seasons Education (Cayman) quarterly revenues of --. 51 Talk Online Education Group's net income of -$1.4M is higher than Four Seasons Education (Cayman)'s net income of --. Notably, 51 Talk Online Education Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Four Seasons Education (Cayman)'s PE ratio is 84.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 51 Talk Online Education Group is 2.19x versus 0.85x for Four Seasons Education (Cayman). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COE51 Talk Online Education Group2.19x -- $16.2M -$1.4M FEDUFour Seasons Education (Cayman)0.85x 84.93x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COE or IH?
iHuman has a net margin of -8.49% compared to 51 Talk Online Education Group's net margin of 11.38%. 51 Talk Online Education Group's return on equity of -- beat iHuman's return on equity of 10.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COE51 Talk Online Education Group77.51% -- -$14.7M IHiHuman67.23% $0.07 $131.6M -
What do Analysts Say About COE or IH?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 86.92%. On the other hand iHuman has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 64.47%. Given that 51 Talk Online Education Group has higher upside potential than iHuman, analysts believe 51 Talk Online Education Group is more attractive than iHuman.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COE51 Talk Online Education Group0 0 0 IHiHuman0 0 0 -
Is COE or IH More Risky?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a beta of -0.167, which suggesting that the stock is 116.682% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iHuman has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COE or IH?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iHuman offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. 51 Talk Online Education Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iHuman pays out 35.77% of its earnings as a dividend. iHuman's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COE or IH?
51 Talk Online Education Group quarterly revenues are $16.2M, which are smaller than iHuman quarterly revenues of $32.3M. 51 Talk Online Education Group's net income of -$1.4M is lower than iHuman's net income of $3.7M. Notably, 51 Talk Online Education Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iHuman's PE ratio is 9.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 51 Talk Online Education Group is 2.19x versus 0.97x for iHuman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COE51 Talk Online Education Group2.19x -- $16.2M -$1.4M IHiHuman0.97x 9.11x $32.3M $3.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns COE or SISI?
Shineco has a net margin of -8.49% compared to 51 Talk Online Education Group's net margin of -36900.97%. 51 Talk Online Education Group's return on equity of -- beat Shineco's return on equity of -99.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COE51 Talk Online Education Group77.51% -- -$14.7M SISIShineco-34.44% -$23.04 $37.5M -
What do Analysts Say About COE or SISI?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 86.92%. On the other hand Shineco has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that 51 Talk Online Education Group has higher upside potential than Shineco, analysts believe 51 Talk Online Education Group is more attractive than Shineco.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COE51 Talk Online Education Group0 0 0 SISIShineco0 0 0 -
Is COE or SISI More Risky?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a beta of -0.167, which suggesting that the stock is 116.682% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shineco has a beta of -0.522, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.222%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COE or SISI?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shineco offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 51 Talk Online Education Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shineco pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COE or SISI?
51 Talk Online Education Group quarterly revenues are $16.2M, which are larger than Shineco quarterly revenues of $41K. 51 Talk Online Education Group's net income of -$1.4M is higher than Shineco's net income of -$15.1M. Notably, 51 Talk Online Education Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Shineco's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 51 Talk Online Education Group is 2.19x versus 0.04x for Shineco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COE51 Talk Online Education Group2.19x -- $16.2M -$1.4M SISIShineco0.04x -- $41K -$15.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns COE or TANH?
Tantech Holdings has a net margin of -8.49% compared to 51 Talk Online Education Group's net margin of --. 51 Talk Online Education Group's return on equity of -- beat Tantech Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COE51 Talk Online Education Group77.51% -- -$14.7M TANHTantech Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About COE or TANH?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 86.92%. On the other hand Tantech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that 51 Talk Online Education Group has higher upside potential than Tantech Holdings, analysts believe 51 Talk Online Education Group is more attractive than Tantech Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COE51 Talk Online Education Group0 0 0 TANHTantech Holdings0 0 0 -
Is COE or TANH More Risky?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a beta of -0.167, which suggesting that the stock is 116.682% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tantech Holdings has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.692%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COE or TANH?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tantech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 51 Talk Online Education Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tantech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COE or TANH?
51 Talk Online Education Group quarterly revenues are $16.2M, which are larger than Tantech Holdings quarterly revenues of --. 51 Talk Online Education Group's net income of -$1.4M is higher than Tantech Holdings's net income of --. Notably, 51 Talk Online Education Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tantech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 51 Talk Online Education Group is 2.19x versus 0.03x for Tantech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COE51 Talk Online Education Group2.19x -- $16.2M -$1.4M TANHTantech Holdings0.03x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COE or YQ?
17 Education & Technology Group has a net margin of -8.49% compared to 51 Talk Online Education Group's net margin of -29.18%. 51 Talk Online Education Group's return on equity of -- beat 17 Education & Technology Group's return on equity of -47.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COE51 Talk Online Education Group77.51% -- -$14.7M YQ17 Education & Technology Group60.94% -$0.28 $57.3M -
What do Analysts Say About COE or YQ?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 86.92%. On the other hand 17 Education & Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1736.37%. Given that 17 Education & Technology Group has higher upside potential than 51 Talk Online Education Group, analysts believe 17 Education & Technology Group is more attractive than 51 Talk Online Education Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COE51 Talk Online Education Group0 0 0 YQ17 Education & Technology Group0 0 0 -
Is COE or YQ More Risky?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a beta of -0.167, which suggesting that the stock is 116.682% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 17 Education & Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COE or YQ?
51 Talk Online Education Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 17 Education & Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 51 Talk Online Education Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 17 Education & Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COE or YQ?
51 Talk Online Education Group quarterly revenues are $16.2M, which are larger than 17 Education & Technology Group quarterly revenues of $8.3M. 51 Talk Online Education Group's net income of -$1.4M is higher than 17 Education & Technology Group's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, 51 Talk Online Education Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 17 Education & Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 51 Talk Online Education Group is 2.19x versus 0.60x for 17 Education & Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COE51 Talk Online Education Group2.19x -- $16.2M -$1.4M YQ17 Education & Technology Group0.60x -- $8.3M -$2.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is GlobalFoundries On The Verge Of A Breakout?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ:GFS) is as a semiconductor foundry whose chips…
Is Dick’s Sporting Goods Buying Foot Locker Smart?
Last week, Dick’s Sporting Goods (NYSE:DKS) announced that it would…
Stock Ideas
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
68
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 45x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
58
WIX alert for May 22
Wix.com [WIX] is up 1.88% over the past day.
Buy
81
DY alert for May 22
Dycom Industries [DY] is down 0% over the past day.
Sell
50
FICO alert for May 22
Fair Isaac [FICO] is down 0.46% over the past day.
