AMBO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of -- compared to Ambow Education Holding's net margin of 5.73%. Ambow Education Holding's return on equity of -- beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.86%.

Ambow Education Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 32.04%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Ambow Education Holding, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Ambow Education Holding.

Ambow Education Holding has a beta of 0.714, which suggesting that the stock is 28.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.566, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.567%.

Ambow Education Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ambow Education Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ambow Education Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $119.4M. Ambow Education Holding's net income of -- is lower than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Ambow Education Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 53.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambow Education Holding is 0.51x versus 1.19x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mynd.ai has a net margin of -- compared to Ambow Education Holding's net margin of --. Ambow Education Holding's return on equity of -- beat Mynd.ai's return on equity of -126.08%.

Ambow Education Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mynd.ai has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ambow Education Holding has higher upside potential than Mynd.ai, analysts believe Ambow Education Holding is more attractive than Mynd.ai.

Ambow Education Holding has a beta of 0.714, which suggesting that the stock is 28.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mynd.ai has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.462%.

Ambow Education Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mynd.ai offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share. Ambow Education Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mynd.ai pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ambow Education Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mynd.ai quarterly revenues of --. Ambow Education Holding's net income of -- is lower than Mynd.ai's net income of --. Notably, Ambow Education Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mynd.ai's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambow Education Holding is 0.51x versus 0.12x for Mynd.ai. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group has a net margin of -- compared to Ambow Education Holding's net margin of --. Ambow Education Holding's return on equity of -- beat NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group's return on equity of --.

Ambow Education Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ambow Education Holding has higher upside potential than NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group, analysts believe Ambow Education Holding is more attractive than NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group.

Ambow Education Holding has a beta of 0.714, which suggesting that the stock is 28.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ambow Education Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ambow Education Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ambow Education Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group quarterly revenues of --. Ambow Education Holding's net income of -- is lower than NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group's net income of -$1.6K. Notably, Ambow Education Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambow Education Holding is 0.51x versus 14.07x for NP Life Sciences Health Industry Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of -- compared to Ambow Education Holding's net margin of 17.83%. Ambow Education Holding's return on equity of -- beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39%.

Ambow Education Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.68%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Ambow Education Holding, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Ambow Education Holding.

Ambow Education Holding has a beta of 0.714, which suggesting that the stock is 28.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.362%.

Ambow Education Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Ambow Education Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ambow Education Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $176.4M. Ambow Education Holding's net income of -- is lower than Perdoceo Education's net income of $31.5M. Notably, Ambow Education Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 11.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambow Education Holding is 0.51x versus 2.45x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.