VSEC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conrad Industries has a net margin of 4.37% compared to VSE's net margin of --. VSE's return on equity of 2.02% beat Conrad Industries's return on equity of --.

VSE has a consensus price target of $137.77, signalling upside risk potential of 20.3%. On the other hand Conrad Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -16.46%. Given that VSE has higher upside potential than Conrad Industries, analysts believe VSE is more attractive than Conrad Industries.

VSE has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conrad Industries has a beta of 0.382, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.843%.

VSE has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. Conrad Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VSE pays 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Conrad Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. VSE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VSE quarterly revenues are $299M, which are larger than Conrad Industries quarterly revenues of --. VSE's net income of $13.1M is higher than Conrad Industries's net income of --. Notably, VSE's price-to-earnings ratio is 142.44x while Conrad Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VSE is 1.91x versus 0.30x for Conrad Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 4.37% compared to VSE's net margin of 14.3%. VSE's return on equity of 2.02% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 16.73%.

VSE has a consensus price target of $137.77, signalling upside risk potential of 20.3%. On the other hand Curtiss-Wright has an analysts' consensus of $378.39 which suggests that it could grow by 9.71%. Given that VSE has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe VSE is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

VSE has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.51%.

VSE has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. Curtiss-Wright offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. VSE pays 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VSE quarterly revenues are $299M, which are smaller than Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues of $824.3M. VSE's net income of $13.1M is lower than Curtiss-Wright's net income of $117.9M. Notably, VSE's price-to-earnings ratio is 142.44x while Curtiss-Wright's PE ratio is 32.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VSE is 1.91x versus 4.24x for Curtiss-Wright. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sturm Ruger & has a net margin of 4.37% compared to VSE's net margin of 7.19%. VSE's return on equity of 2.02% beat Sturm Ruger &'s return on equity of 9.44%.

VSE has a consensus price target of $137.77, signalling upside risk potential of 20.3%. On the other hand Sturm Ruger & has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.13%. Given that VSE has higher upside potential than Sturm Ruger &, analysts believe VSE is more attractive than Sturm Ruger &.

VSE has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sturm Ruger & has a beta of 0.199, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.071%.

VSE has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. Sturm Ruger & offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. VSE pays 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm Ruger & pays out 38.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VSE quarterly revenues are $299M, which are larger than Sturm Ruger & quarterly revenues of $145.8M. VSE's net income of $13.1M is higher than Sturm Ruger &'s net income of $10.5M. Notably, VSE's price-to-earnings ratio is 142.44x while Sturm Ruger &'s PE ratio is 22.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VSE is 1.91x versus 1.31x for Sturm Ruger &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

V2X has a net margin of 4.37% compared to VSE's net margin of 2.16%. VSE's return on equity of 2.02% beat V2X's return on equity of 3.47%.

VSE has a consensus price target of $137.77, signalling upside risk potential of 20.3%. On the other hand V2X has an analysts' consensus of $63.36 which suggests that it could grow by 27.34%. Given that V2X has higher upside potential than VSE, analysts believe V2X is more attractive than VSE.

VSE has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison V2X has a beta of 0.267, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.35%.

VSE has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. V2X offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VSE pays 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. V2X pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. VSE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VSE quarterly revenues are $299M, which are smaller than V2X quarterly revenues of $1.2B. VSE's net income of $13.1M is lower than V2X's net income of $25M. Notably, VSE's price-to-earnings ratio is 142.44x while V2X's PE ratio is 46.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VSE is 1.91x versus 0.37x for V2X. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.