VNOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Delek Logistics Partners LP has a net margin of 23.36% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of 15.73%. Viper Energy's return on equity of 7.18% beat Delek Logistics Partners LP's return on equity of --.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $58.14, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand Delek Logistics Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $44.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.42%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Delek Logistics Partners LP, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Delek Logistics Partners LP.

Viper Energy has a beta of 1.733, which suggesting that the stock is 73.321% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delek Logistics Partners LP has a beta of 2.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.279%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.75%. Delek Logistics Partners LP offers a yield of 10.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Viper Energy pays 162.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Delek Logistics Partners LP pays out 142.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $209.4M, which are smaller than Delek Logistics Partners LP quarterly revenues of $214.1M. Viper Energy's net income of $48.9M is higher than Delek Logistics Partners LP's net income of $33.7M. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.68x while Delek Logistics Partners LP's PE ratio is 14.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 5.35x versus 1.94x for Delek Logistics Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hess Midstream LP has a net margin of 23.36% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of 15.52%. Viper Energy's return on equity of 7.18% beat Hess Midstream LP's return on equity of 46.74%.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $58.14, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand Hess Midstream LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.54%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Hess Midstream LP, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Hess Midstream LP.

Viper Energy has a beta of 1.733, which suggesting that the stock is 73.321% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hess Midstream LP has a beta of 1.526, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.573%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.75%. Hess Midstream LP offers a yield of 6.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Viper Energy pays 162.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess Midstream LP pays out 107.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $209.4M, which are smaller than Hess Midstream LP quarterly revenues of $377.6M. Viper Energy's net income of $48.9M is lower than Hess Midstream LP's net income of $58.6M. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.68x while Hess Midstream LP's PE ratio is 16.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 5.35x versus 2.09x for Hess Midstream LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MPLX LP has a net margin of 23.36% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of 37.36%. Viper Energy's return on equity of 7.18% beat MPLX LP's return on equity of 31.81%.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $58.14, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand MPLX LP has an analysts' consensus of $51.25 which suggests that it could grow by 5.63%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than MPLX LP, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than MPLX LP.

Viper Energy has a beta of 1.733, which suggesting that the stock is 73.321% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MPLX LP has a beta of 1.435, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.455%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.75%. MPLX LP offers a yield of 7.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Viper Energy pays 162.31% of its earnings as a dividend. MPLX LP pays out 83.91% of its earnings as a dividend. MPLX LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Viper Energy's is not.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $209.4M, which are smaller than MPLX LP quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Viper Energy's net income of $48.9M is lower than MPLX LP's net income of $1B. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.68x while MPLX LP's PE ratio is 11.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 5.35x versus 4.58x for MPLX LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Midstream Partners LP has a net margin of 23.36% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of 32.66%. Viper Energy's return on equity of 7.18% beat Western Midstream Partners LP's return on equity of 47.28%.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $58.14, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand Western Midstream Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $40.28 which suggests that it could grow by 1.6%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Western Midstream Partners LP, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Western Midstream Partners LP.

Viper Energy has a beta of 1.733, which suggesting that the stock is 73.321% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Midstream Partners LP has a beta of 2.896, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 189.634%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.75%. Western Midstream Partners LP offers a yield of 8.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Viper Energy pays 162.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Western Midstream Partners LP pays out 95.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Western Midstream Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Viper Energy's is not.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $209.4M, which are smaller than Western Midstream Partners LP quarterly revenues of $883.4M. Viper Energy's net income of $48.9M is lower than Western Midstream Partners LP's net income of $288.5M. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.68x while Western Midstream Partners LP's PE ratio is 10.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 5.35x versus 4.29x for Western Midstream Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.