USLM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MP Materials has a net margin of 37.38% compared to United States Lime & Minerals's net margin of -37.24%. United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 25.53% beat MP Materials's return on equity of -9.68%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a consensus price target of $105.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.98%. On the other hand MP Materials has an analysts' consensus of $26.70 which suggests that it could grow by 36.23%. Given that MP Materials has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe MP Materials is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 3.035% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MP Materials has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. MP Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Lime & Minerals pays 5.25% of its earnings as a dividend. MP Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues are $91.3M, which are larger than MP Materials quarterly revenues of $60.8M. United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $34.1M is higher than MP Materials's net income of -$22.6M. Notably, United States Lime & Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.76x while MP Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Lime & Minerals is 8.85x versus 14.90x for MP Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NioCorp Developments has a net margin of 37.38% compared to United States Lime & Minerals's net margin of --. United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 25.53% beat NioCorp Developments's return on equity of --.

United States Lime & Minerals has a consensus price target of $105.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.98%. On the other hand NioCorp Developments has an analysts' consensus of $4.13 which suggests that it could grow by 73.32%. Given that NioCorp Developments has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe NioCorp Developments is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 3.035% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NioCorp Developments has a beta of -0.084, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.442%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. NioCorp Developments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Lime & Minerals pays 5.25% of its earnings as a dividend. NioCorp Developments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues are $91.3M, which are larger than NioCorp Developments quarterly revenues of --. United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $34.1M is higher than NioCorp Developments's net income of -$5.3M. Notably, United States Lime & Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.76x while NioCorp Developments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Lime & Minerals is 8.85x versus 5,553.42x for NioCorp Developments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Antimony has a net margin of 37.38% compared to United States Lime & Minerals's net margin of 7.81%. United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 25.53% beat United States Antimony's return on equity of -3.13%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a consensus price target of $105.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.98%. On the other hand United States Antimony has an analysts' consensus of $4.94 which suggests that it could grow by 104.03%. Given that United States Antimony has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe United States Antimony is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 3.035% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Antimony has a beta of 0.153, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.678%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. United States Antimony offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Lime & Minerals pays 5.25% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Antimony pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues are $91.3M, which are larger than United States Antimony quarterly revenues of $7M. United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $34.1M is higher than United States Antimony's net income of $546.5K. Notably, United States Lime & Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.76x while United States Antimony's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Lime & Minerals is 8.85x versus 14.23x for United States Antimony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vulcan Materials has a net margin of 37.38% compared to United States Lime & Minerals's net margin of 7.89%. United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 25.53% beat Vulcan Materials's return on equity of 11.89%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a consensus price target of $105.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.98%. On the other hand Vulcan Materials has an analysts' consensus of $294.39 which suggests that it could grow by 12.13%. Given that Vulcan Materials has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe Vulcan Materials is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 3.035% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.625%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Vulcan Materials offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. United States Lime & Minerals pays 5.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials pays out 26.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues are $91.3M, which are smaller than Vulcan Materials quarterly revenues of $1.6B. United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $34.1M is lower than Vulcan Materials's net income of $128.9M. Notably, United States Lime & Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.76x while Vulcan Materials's PE ratio is 37.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Lime & Minerals is 8.85x versus 4.65x for Vulcan Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.