STRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Adtalem Global Education has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 11.06%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 7.63% beat Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 12.62%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $123.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.12%. On the other hand Adtalem Global Education has an analysts' consensus of $101.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.65%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Adtalem Global Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Adtalem Global Education.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.587, which suggesting that the stock is 41.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.113%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. Adtalem Global Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Education pays 84.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Adtalem Global Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $306M, which are smaller than Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues of $417.4M. Strategic Education's net income of $27.7M is lower than Adtalem Global Education's net income of $46.2M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.87x while Adtalem Global Education's PE ratio is 21.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.87x versus 2.23x for Adtalem Global Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grand Canyon Education has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 17.4%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 7.63% beat Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 30.82%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $123.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.12%. On the other hand Grand Canyon Education has an analysts' consensus of $158.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.27%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.587, which suggesting that the stock is 41.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.053%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. Grand Canyon Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Education pays 84.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Canyon Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $306M, which are larger than Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues of $238.3M. Strategic Education's net income of $27.7M is lower than Grand Canyon Education's net income of $41.5M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.87x while Grand Canyon Education's PE ratio is 21.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.87x versus 4.72x for Grand Canyon Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 22.53%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 7.63% beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 15.25%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $123.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.12%. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.35%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Perdoceo Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Perdoceo Education.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.587, which suggesting that the stock is 41.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.878%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Strategic Education pays 84.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 9.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $306M, which are larger than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $169.8M. Strategic Education's net income of $27.7M is lower than Perdoceo Education's net income of $38.3M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.87x while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 13.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.87x versus 2.73x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Technical Institute has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 9.6%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 7.63% beat Universal Technical Institute's return on equity of 17.79%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $123.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.12%. On the other hand Universal Technical Institute has an analysts' consensus of $26.33 which suggests that it could grow by 0.17%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Universal Technical Institute, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Universal Technical Institute.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.587, which suggesting that the stock is 41.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Technical Institute has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.332%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. Universal Technical Institute offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Education pays 84.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Technical Institute pays out 2.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $306M, which are larger than Universal Technical Institute quarterly revenues of $196.4M. Strategic Education's net income of $27.7M is higher than Universal Technical Institute's net income of $18.8M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.87x while Universal Technical Institute's PE ratio is 35.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.87x versus 1.82x for Universal Technical Institute. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.