SPCB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Iveda Solutions has a net margin of -- compared to SuperCom's net margin of -23.14%. SuperCom's return on equity of -- beat Iveda Solutions's return on equity of -60.54%.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 217.46%. On the other hand Iveda Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 233.33%. Given that Iveda Solutions has higher upside potential than SuperCom, analysts believe Iveda Solutions is more attractive than SuperCom.

SuperCom has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iveda Solutions has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.004%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Iveda Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Iveda Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Iveda Solutions quarterly revenues of $2.4M. SuperCom's net income of -- is lower than Iveda Solutions's net income of -$555K. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Iveda Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.18x versus 0.92x for Iveda Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NAPCO Security Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to SuperCom's net margin of 24.38%. SuperCom's return on equity of -- beat NAPCO Security Technologies's return on equity of 28.2%.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 217.46%. On the other hand NAPCO Security Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $29.60 which suggests that it could grow by 45.96%. Given that SuperCom has higher upside potential than NAPCO Security Technologies, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than NAPCO Security Technologies.

SuperCom has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NAPCO Security Technologies has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.279%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NAPCO Security Technologies offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NAPCO Security Technologies pays out 26.61% of its earnings as a dividend. NAPCO Security Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NAPCO Security Technologies quarterly revenues of $42.9M. SuperCom's net income of -- is lower than NAPCO Security Technologies's net income of $10.5M. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NAPCO Security Technologies's PE ratio is 15.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.18x versus 4.03x for NAPCO Security Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Security Instruments has a net margin of -- compared to SuperCom's net margin of -16.92%. SuperCom's return on equity of -- beat Universal Security Instruments's return on equity of -26.44%.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 217.46%. On the other hand Universal Security Instruments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SuperCom has higher upside potential than Universal Security Instruments, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than Universal Security Instruments.

SuperCom has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Security Instruments has a beta of 0.351, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.945%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Security Instruments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Security Instruments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Universal Security Instruments quarterly revenues of $5.5M. SuperCom's net income of -- is lower than Universal Security Instruments's net income of -$936.6K. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Universal Security Instruments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.18x versus 0.19x for Universal Security Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VerifyMe has a net margin of -- compared to SuperCom's net margin of -6.54%. SuperCom's return on equity of -- beat VerifyMe's return on equity of -33.15%.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 217.46%. On the other hand VerifyMe has an analysts' consensus of $1.63 which suggests that it could grow by 174.4%. Given that SuperCom has higher upside potential than VerifyMe, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than VerifyMe.

SuperCom has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VerifyMe has a beta of 0.532, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.775%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VerifyMe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VerifyMe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VerifyMe quarterly revenues of $7.7M. SuperCom's net income of -- is lower than VerifyMe's net income of -$501K. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VerifyMe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.18x versus 0.25x for VerifyMe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.