SKWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of 4.73% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of 44.89%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.2% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.79%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $56.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.56%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.471, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.925%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $304.5M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $338.7M. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $14.4M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $152M. Notably, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.18x while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 36.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is 1.89x versus 5.84x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fundamental Global has a net margin of 4.73% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of -65.47%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.2% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $56.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.56%. On the other hand Fundamental Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.817, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.331%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fundamental Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global pays out -122.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $304.5M, which are larger than Fundamental Global quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $14.4M is lower than Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.18x while Fundamental Global's PE ratio is 0.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is 1.89x versus 0.54x for Fundamental Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of 4.73% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of 6.77%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.2% beat Root's return on equity of 17.79%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $56.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.56%. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of $105.20 which suggests that it could fall by -12.33%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Root.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $304.5M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $326.7M. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $14.4M is lower than Root's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.18x while Root's PE ratio is 70.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is 1.89x versus 1.62x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 4.73% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of 0.49%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.2% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -3.1%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $56.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.56%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $52.60 which suggests that it could grow by 47.67%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.665, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.468%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $304.5M, which are smaller than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $337.3M. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $14.4M is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.18x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is 1.89x versus 1.17x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.