PLL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Compass Minerals International has a net margin of -60.32% compared to Piedmont Lithium's net margin of -23.13%. Piedmont Lithium's return on equity of -25.05% beat Compass Minerals International's return on equity of -50.54%.

Piedmont Lithium has a consensus price target of $14.50, signalling upside risk potential of 51.83%. On the other hand Compass Minerals International has an analysts' consensus of $16.60 which suggests that it could grow by 41.16%. Given that Piedmont Lithium has higher upside potential than Compass Minerals International, analysts believe Piedmont Lithium is more attractive than Compass Minerals International.

Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.797, which suggesting that the stock is 20.35% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compass Minerals International has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.624%.

Piedmont Lithium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Compass Minerals International offers a yield of 5.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Piedmont Lithium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Compass Minerals International pays out -6.11% of its earnings as a dividend.

Piedmont Lithium quarterly revenues are $27.7M, which are smaller than Compass Minerals International quarterly revenues of $208.8M. Piedmont Lithium's net income of -$16.7M is higher than Compass Minerals International's net income of -$48.3M. Notably, Piedmont Lithium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Compass Minerals International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Piedmont Lithium is 3.93x versus 0.43x for Compass Minerals International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Freeport-McMoRan has a net margin of -60.32% compared to Piedmont Lithium's net margin of 7.75%. Piedmont Lithium's return on equity of -25.05% beat Freeport-McMoRan's return on equity of 7.17%.

Piedmont Lithium has a consensus price target of $14.50, signalling upside risk potential of 51.83%. On the other hand Freeport-McMoRan has an analysts' consensus of $51.73 which suggests that it could grow by 33.52%. Given that Piedmont Lithium has higher upside potential than Freeport-McMoRan, analysts believe Piedmont Lithium is more attractive than Freeport-McMoRan.

Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.797, which suggesting that the stock is 20.35% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freeport-McMoRan has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.395%.

Piedmont Lithium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freeport-McMoRan offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Piedmont Lithium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freeport-McMoRan pays out 46.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Freeport-McMoRan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Piedmont Lithium quarterly revenues are $27.7M, which are smaller than Freeport-McMoRan quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Piedmont Lithium's net income of -$16.7M is lower than Freeport-McMoRan's net income of $526M. Notably, Piedmont Lithium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Freeport-McMoRan's PE ratio is 28.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Piedmont Lithium is 3.93x versus 2.18x for Freeport-McMoRan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Idaho Strategic Resources has a net margin of -60.32% compared to Piedmont Lithium's net margin of 32.57%. Piedmont Lithium's return on equity of -25.05% beat Idaho Strategic Resources's return on equity of 26.06%.

Piedmont Lithium has a consensus price target of $14.50, signalling upside risk potential of 51.83%. On the other hand Idaho Strategic Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 59.42%. Given that Idaho Strategic Resources has higher upside potential than Piedmont Lithium, analysts believe Idaho Strategic Resources is more attractive than Piedmont Lithium.

Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.797, which suggesting that the stock is 20.35% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Idaho Strategic Resources has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.442%.

Piedmont Lithium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Idaho Strategic Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Piedmont Lithium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Idaho Strategic Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Piedmont Lithium quarterly revenues are $27.7M, which are larger than Idaho Strategic Resources quarterly revenues of $6.2M. Piedmont Lithium's net income of -$16.7M is lower than Idaho Strategic Resources's net income of $2M. Notably, Piedmont Lithium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Idaho Strategic Resources's PE ratio is 20.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Piedmont Lithium is 3.93x versus 6.04x for Idaho Strategic Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rare Element Resources has a net margin of -60.32% compared to Piedmont Lithium's net margin of --. Piedmont Lithium's return on equity of -25.05% beat Rare Element Resources's return on equity of --.

Piedmont Lithium has a consensus price target of $14.50, signalling upside risk potential of 51.83%. On the other hand Rare Element Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 613.69%. Given that Rare Element Resources has higher upside potential than Piedmont Lithium, analysts believe Rare Element Resources is more attractive than Piedmont Lithium.

Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.797, which suggesting that the stock is 20.35% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rare Element Resources has a beta of 1.471, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.104%.

Piedmont Lithium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rare Element Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Piedmont Lithium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rare Element Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Piedmont Lithium quarterly revenues are $27.7M, which are larger than Rare Element Resources quarterly revenues of --. Piedmont Lithium's net income of -$16.7M is higher than Rare Element Resources's net income of --. Notably, Piedmont Lithium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rare Element Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Piedmont Lithium is 3.93x versus -- for Rare Element Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.