PLAB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FormFactor has a net margin of 20.2% compared to Photronics's net margin of 3.74%. Photronics's return on equity of 10.37% beat FormFactor's return on equity of 5.72%.

Photronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 79.76%. On the other hand FormFactor has an analysts' consensus of $39.44 which suggests that it could grow by 29.88%. Given that Photronics has higher upside potential than FormFactor, analysts believe Photronics is more attractive than FormFactor.

Photronics has a beta of 1.426, which suggesting that the stock is 42.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FormFactor has a beta of 1.136, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.592%.

Photronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FormFactor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Photronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FormFactor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Photronics quarterly revenues are $212.1M, which are larger than FormFactor quarterly revenues of $171.4M. Photronics's net income of $42.9M is higher than FormFactor's net income of $6.4M. Notably, Photronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.29x while FormFactor's PE ratio is 44.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Photronics is 1.41x versus 3.10x for FormFactor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

inTest has a net margin of 20.2% compared to Photronics's net margin of -8.74%. Photronics's return on equity of 10.37% beat inTest's return on equity of -0.1%.

Photronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 79.76%. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 74.42%. Given that Photronics has higher upside potential than inTest, analysts believe Photronics is more attractive than inTest.

Photronics has a beta of 1.426, which suggesting that the stock is 42.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.626, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.563%.

Photronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Photronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Photronics quarterly revenues are $212.1M, which are larger than inTest quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Photronics's net income of $42.9M is higher than inTest's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Photronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.29x while inTest's PE ratio is 25.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Photronics is 1.41x versus 0.58x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kulicke & Soffa Industries has a net margin of 20.2% compared to Photronics's net margin of -52.18%. Photronics's return on equity of 10.37% beat Kulicke & Soffa Industries's return on equity of 2.26%.

Photronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 79.76%. On the other hand Kulicke & Soffa Industries has an analysts' consensus of $46.60 which suggests that it could grow by 24.14%. Given that Photronics has higher upside potential than Kulicke & Soffa Industries, analysts believe Photronics is more attractive than Kulicke & Soffa Industries.

Photronics has a beta of 1.426, which suggesting that the stock is 42.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kulicke & Soffa Industries has a beta of 1.534, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.428%.

Photronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kulicke & Soffa Industries offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Photronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kulicke & Soffa Industries pays out -64% of its earnings as a dividend.

Photronics quarterly revenues are $212.1M, which are larger than Kulicke & Soffa Industries quarterly revenues of $162M. Photronics's net income of $42.9M is higher than Kulicke & Soffa Industries's net income of -$84.5M. Notably, Photronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.29x while Kulicke & Soffa Industries's PE ratio is 88.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Photronics is 1.41x versus 2.51x for Kulicke & Soffa Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SkyWater Technology has a net margin of 20.2% compared to Photronics's net margin of -11.98%. Photronics's return on equity of 10.37% beat SkyWater Technology's return on equity of -13.66%.

Photronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 79.76%. On the other hand SkyWater Technology has an analysts' consensus of $11.80 which suggests that it could grow by 22.22%. Given that Photronics has higher upside potential than SkyWater Technology, analysts believe Photronics is more attractive than SkyWater Technology.

Photronics has a beta of 1.426, which suggesting that the stock is 42.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SkyWater Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Photronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SkyWater Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Photronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SkyWater Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Photronics quarterly revenues are $212.1M, which are larger than SkyWater Technology quarterly revenues of $61.3M. Photronics's net income of $42.9M is higher than SkyWater Technology's net income of -$7.3M. Notably, Photronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.29x while SkyWater Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Photronics is 1.41x versus 1.32x for SkyWater Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.