NUKK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of -922.44% compared to Nukkleus's net margin of 20.17%. Nukkleus's return on equity of -- beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 82.22%.

Nukkleus has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $308.61 which suggests that it could grow by 4.34%. Given that Automatic Data Processing has higher upside potential than Nukkleus, analysts believe Automatic Data Processing is more attractive than Nukkleus.

Nukkleus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.191%.

Nukkleus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Nukkleus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nukkleus quarterly revenues are $175.2K, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Nukkleus's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $963.2M. Notably, Nukkleus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 30.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nukkleus is 4.75x versus 6.46x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of -922.44% compared to Nukkleus's net margin of 18.49%. Nukkleus's return on equity of -- beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Nukkleus has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $320.15 which suggests that it could grow by 17.32%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Nukkleus, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Nukkleus.

Nukkleus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.404%.

Nukkleus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nukkleus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nukkleus quarterly revenues are $175.2K, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Nukkleus's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Nukkleus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 53.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nukkleus is 4.75x versus 9.66x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys has a net margin of -922.44% compared to Nukkleus's net margin of 5.51%. Nukkleus's return on equity of -- beat Agilysys's return on equity of 8.99%.

Nukkleus has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of $122.00 which suggests that it could grow by 62.65%. Given that Agilysys has higher upside potential than Nukkleus, analysts believe Agilysys is more attractive than Nukkleus.

Nukkleus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.640, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.955%.

Nukkleus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nukkleus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out 1.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nukkleus quarterly revenues are $175.2K, which are smaller than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $69.6M. Nukkleus's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Agilysys's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Nukkleus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agilysys's PE ratio is 93.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nukkleus is 4.75x versus 8.02x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -922.44% compared to Nukkleus's net margin of 0.54%. Nukkleus's return on equity of -- beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

Nukkleus has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 259.53%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Nukkleus, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Nukkleus.

Nukkleus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.768%.

Nukkleus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nukkleus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nukkleus quarterly revenues are $175.2K, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. Nukkleus's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, Nukkleus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nukkleus is 4.75x versus 0.65x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.