NUKK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of -922.44% compared to Nukkleus's net margin of 24.04%. Nukkleus's return on equity of -- beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53%.

Nukkleus has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $309.54 which suggests that it could fall by -3.08%. Given that Automatic Data Processing has higher upside potential than Nukkleus, analysts believe Automatic Data Processing is more attractive than Nukkleus.

Nukkleus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.48%.

Nukkleus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Nukkleus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nukkleus quarterly revenues are $175.2K, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Nukkleus's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Nukkleus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 32.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nukkleus is 5.85x versus 6.86x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of -922.44% compared to Nukkleus's net margin of 18.49%. Nukkleus's return on equity of -- beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Nukkleus has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $321.21 which suggests that it could grow by 7.76%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Nukkleus, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Nukkleus.

Nukkleus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.828%.

Nukkleus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nukkleus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nukkleus quarterly revenues are $175.2K, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Nukkleus's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Nukkleus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 58.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nukkleus is 5.85x versus 10.55x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys has a net margin of -922.44% compared to Nukkleus's net margin of 5.51%. Nukkleus's return on equity of -- beat Agilysys's return on equity of 8.99%.

Nukkleus has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of $122.00 which suggests that it could grow by 41.86%. Given that Agilysys has higher upside potential than Nukkleus, analysts believe Agilysys is more attractive than Nukkleus.

Nukkleus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.579, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.051%.

Nukkleus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nukkleus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out 1.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nukkleus quarterly revenues are $175.2K, which are smaller than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $69.6M. Nukkleus's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Agilysys's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Nukkleus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agilysys's PE ratio is 107.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nukkleus is 5.85x versus 9.19x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -922.44% compared to Nukkleus's net margin of -4.72%. Nukkleus's return on equity of -- beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

Nukkleus has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.48 which suggests that it could grow by 220.03%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Nukkleus, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Nukkleus.

Nukkleus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.643%.

Nukkleus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nukkleus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nukkleus quarterly revenues are $175.2K, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. Nukkleus's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Nukkleus's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nukkleus is 5.85x versus 0.70x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.