NCTY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LexinFintech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to The9's net margin of 8.45%. The9's return on equity of -- beat LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 7.49%.

The9 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.12 which suggests that it could fall by -29%. Given that LexinFintech Holdings has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings is more attractive than The9.

The9 has a beta of 2.095, which suggesting that the stock is 109.461% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.631, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.888%.

The9 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LexinFintech Holdings offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. The9 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings pays out 12.72% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The9 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues of $511.5M. The9's net income of -- is lower than LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $43.2M. Notably, The9's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LexinFintech Holdings's PE ratio is 9.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The9 is 2.55x versus 0.50x for LexinFintech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Noah Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to The9's net margin of 19.66%. The9's return on equity of -- beat Noah Holdings's return on equity of 5.7%.

The9 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Noah Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.23 which suggests that it could grow by 23.03%. Given that Noah Holdings has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe Noah Holdings is more attractive than The9.

The9 has a beta of 2.095, which suggesting that the stock is 109.461% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noah Holdings has a beta of 0.792, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.752%.

The9 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Noah Holdings offers a yield of 9.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.11 per share. The9 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings pays out 17.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The9 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Noah Holdings quarterly revenues of $95.5M. The9's net income of -- is lower than Noah Holdings's net income of $18.8M. Notably, The9's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Noah Holdings's PE ratio is 9.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The9 is 2.55x versus 1.97x for Noah Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pintec Technology Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to The9's net margin of --. The9's return on equity of -- beat Pintec Technology Holdings's return on equity of --.

The9 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pintec Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The9 has higher upside potential than Pintec Technology Holdings, analysts believe The9 is more attractive than Pintec Technology Holdings.

The9 has a beta of 2.095, which suggesting that the stock is 109.461% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pintec Technology Holdings has a beta of 0.716, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.368%.

The9 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pintec Technology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The9 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pintec Technology Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The9 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pintec Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of --. The9's net income of -- is lower than Pintec Technology Holdings's net income of --. Notably, The9's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pintec Technology Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The9 is 2.55x versus 3.58x for Pintec Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qudian has a net margin of -- compared to The9's net margin of -131.8%. The9's return on equity of -- beat Qudian's return on equity of 0.35%.

The9 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Qudian has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -61.23%. Given that Qudian has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe Qudian is more attractive than The9.

The9 has a beta of 2.095, which suggesting that the stock is 109.461% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qudian has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.101%.

The9 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qudian offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The9 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qudian pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The9 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Qudian quarterly revenues of $7.7M. The9's net income of -- is lower than Qudian's net income of $18.4M. Notably, The9's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Qudian's PE ratio is 68.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The9 is 2.55x versus 17.22x for Qudian. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.