MQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of -19.97% compared to Marqeta's net margin of -26.62%. Marqeta's return on equity of 2.36% beat Castellum's return on equity of -71.22%.

Marqeta has a consensus price target of $5.02, signalling upside risk potential of 31.36%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.85%. Given that Marqeta has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe Marqeta is more attractive than Castellum.

Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 488.969%.

Marqeta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marqeta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

Marqeta quarterly revenues are $135.8M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Marqeta's net income of -$27.1M is lower than Castellum's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Marqeta's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.40x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marqeta is 3.88x versus 1.13x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cognizant Technology Solutions has a net margin of -19.97% compared to Marqeta's net margin of 10.74%. Marqeta's return on equity of 2.36% beat Cognizant Technology Solutions's return on equity of 16.12%.

Marqeta has a consensus price target of $5.02, signalling upside risk potential of 31.36%. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $87.12 which suggests that it could grow by 24.94%. Given that Marqeta has higher upside potential than Cognizant Technology Solutions, analysts believe Marqeta is more attractive than Cognizant Technology Solutions.

Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.455%.

Marqeta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Marqeta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions pays out 26.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marqeta quarterly revenues are $135.8M, which are smaller than Cognizant Technology Solutions quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Marqeta's net income of -$27.1M is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions's net income of $546M. Notably, Marqeta's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.40x while Cognizant Technology Solutions's PE ratio is 15.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marqeta is 3.88x versus 1.76x for Cognizant Technology Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of -19.97% compared to Marqeta's net margin of 4.19%. Marqeta's return on equity of 2.36% beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 59.94%.

Marqeta has a consensus price target of $5.02, signalling upside risk potential of 31.36%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.34%. Given that Exodus Movement has higher upside potential than Marqeta, analysts believe Exodus Movement is more attractive than Marqeta.

Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marqeta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marqeta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marqeta quarterly revenues are $135.8M, which are larger than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $46M. Marqeta's net income of -$27.1M is lower than Exodus Movement's net income of $66.9M. Notably, Marqeta's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.40x while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 11.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marqeta is 3.88x versus 10.15x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SentinelOne has a net margin of -19.97% compared to Marqeta's net margin of -31.39%. Marqeta's return on equity of 2.36% beat SentinelOne's return on equity of -17.69%.

Marqeta has a consensus price target of $5.02, signalling upside risk potential of 31.36%. On the other hand SentinelOne has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 48.39%. Given that SentinelOne has higher upside potential than Marqeta, analysts believe SentinelOne is more attractive than Marqeta.

Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SentinelOne has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marqeta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SentinelOne offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marqeta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SentinelOne pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marqeta quarterly revenues are $135.8M, which are smaller than SentinelOne quarterly revenues of $225.5M. Marqeta's net income of -$27.1M is higher than SentinelOne's net income of -$70.8M. Notably, Marqeta's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.40x while SentinelOne's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marqeta is 3.88x versus 6.28x for SentinelOne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.