LOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NIO has a net margin of -80.8% compared to Lotus Technology's net margin of -27.53%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of -- beat NIO's return on equity of -98.45%.

Lotus Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 210.56%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $6.10 which suggests that it could grow by 24.59%. Given that Lotus Technology has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe Lotus Technology is more attractive than NIO.

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.806, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.637%.

Lotus Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lotus Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lotus Technology quarterly revenues are $254.7M, which are smaller than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Lotus Technology's net income of -$205.8M is higher than NIO's net income of -$718.1M. Notably, Lotus Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lotus Technology is 1.03x versus 1.10x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Niu Technologies has a net margin of -80.8% compared to Lotus Technology's net margin of -4%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of -- beat Niu Technologies's return on equity of -23.25%.

Lotus Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 210.56%. On the other hand Niu Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $2.43 which suggests that it could fall by -10.56%. Given that Lotus Technology has higher upside potential than Niu Technologies, analysts believe Lotus Technology is more attractive than Niu Technologies.

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Niu Technologies has a beta of 0.451, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.882%.

Lotus Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Niu Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lotus Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Niu Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lotus Technology quarterly revenues are $254.7M, which are larger than Niu Technologies quarterly revenues of $143M. Lotus Technology's net income of -$205.8M is lower than Niu Technologies's net income of -$5.7M. Notably, Lotus Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Niu Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lotus Technology is 1.03x versus 0.52x for Niu Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of -80.8% compared to Lotus Technology's net margin of -17.9%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of -- beat XPeng's return on equity of -17.41%.

Lotus Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 210.56%. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $17.22 which suggests that it could fall by -30.36%. Given that Lotus Technology has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe Lotus Technology is more attractive than XPeng.

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lotus Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lotus Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lotus Technology quarterly revenues are $254.7M, which are smaller than XPeng quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Lotus Technology's net income of -$205.8M is higher than XPeng's net income of -$252.5M. Notably, Lotus Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lotus Technology is 1.03x versus 4.38x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a net margin of -80.8% compared to Lotus Technology's net margin of -6.68%. Lotus Technology's return on equity of -- beat ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's return on equity of --.

Lotus Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 210.56%. On the other hand ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of $36.06 which suggests that it could grow by 16.93%. Given that Lotus Technology has higher upside potential than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding, analysts believe Lotus Technology is more attractive than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding.

Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lotus Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lotus Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lotus Technology quarterly revenues are $254.7M, which are smaller than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Lotus Technology's net income of -$205.8M is lower than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's net income of -$171.3M. Notably, Lotus Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lotus Technology is 1.03x versus 0.78x for ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.