LKFN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

City Holding has a net margin of 31.48% compared to Lakeland Financial's net margin of 41.91%. Lakeland Financial's return on equity of 13.34% beat City Holding's return on equity of 16.39%.

Lakeland Financial has a consensus price target of $62.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.45%. On the other hand City Holding has an analysts' consensus of $122.33 which suggests that it could grow by 4.15%. Given that Lakeland Financial has higher upside potential than City Holding, analysts believe Lakeland Financial is more attractive than City Holding.

Lakeland Financial has a beta of 0.584, which suggesting that the stock is 41.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison City Holding has a beta of 0.521, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.932%.

Lakeland Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. City Holding offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Lakeland Financial pays 52.73% of its earnings as a dividend. City Holding pays out 37.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Financial quarterly revenues are $63.8M, which are smaller than City Holding quarterly revenues of $72.4M. Lakeland Financial's net income of $20.1M is lower than City Holding's net income of $30.3M. Notably, Lakeland Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.65x while City Holding's PE ratio is 14.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Financial is 5.84x versus 5.99x for City Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Financial Bankshares has a net margin of 31.48% compared to Lakeland Financial's net margin of 42.12%. Lakeland Financial's return on equity of 13.34% beat First Financial Bankshares's return on equity of 14.54%.

Lakeland Financial has a consensus price target of $62.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.45%. On the other hand First Financial Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $36.75 which suggests that it could grow by 6.06%. Given that Lakeland Financial has higher upside potential than First Financial Bankshares, analysts believe Lakeland Financial is more attractive than First Financial Bankshares.

Lakeland Financial has a beta of 0.584, which suggesting that the stock is 41.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Financial Bankshares has a beta of 0.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.354%.

Lakeland Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. First Financial Bankshares offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Lakeland Financial pays 52.73% of its earnings as a dividend. First Financial Bankshares pays out 46.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Financial quarterly revenues are $63.8M, which are smaller than First Financial Bankshares quarterly revenues of $145.6M. Lakeland Financial's net income of $20.1M is lower than First Financial Bankshares's net income of $61.3M. Notably, Lakeland Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.65x while First Financial Bankshares's PE ratio is 21.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Financial is 5.84x versus 8.92x for First Financial Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

German American Bancorp has a net margin of 31.48% compared to Lakeland Financial's net margin of 35.63%. Lakeland Financial's return on equity of 13.34% beat German American Bancorp's return on equity of 12.09%.

Lakeland Financial has a consensus price target of $62.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.45%. On the other hand German American Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $45.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.69%. Given that German American Bancorp has higher upside potential than Lakeland Financial, analysts believe German American Bancorp is more attractive than Lakeland Financial.

Lakeland Financial has a beta of 0.584, which suggesting that the stock is 41.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison German American Bancorp has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.438%.

Lakeland Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. German American Bancorp offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Lakeland Financial pays 52.73% of its earnings as a dividend. German American Bancorp pays out 38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Financial quarterly revenues are $63.8M, which are smaller than German American Bancorp quarterly revenues of $65.1M. Lakeland Financial's net income of $20.1M is lower than German American Bancorp's net income of $23.2M. Notably, Lakeland Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.65x while German American Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Financial is 5.84x versus 5.36x for German American Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NBT Bancorp has a net margin of 31.48% compared to Lakeland Financial's net margin of 23.76%. Lakeland Financial's return on equity of 13.34% beat NBT Bancorp's return on equity of 9.55%.

Lakeland Financial has a consensus price target of $62.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.45%. On the other hand NBT Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.60 which suggests that it could grow by 16.56%. Given that NBT Bancorp has higher upside potential than Lakeland Financial, analysts believe NBT Bancorp is more attractive than Lakeland Financial.

Lakeland Financial has a beta of 0.584, which suggesting that the stock is 41.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NBT Bancorp has a beta of 0.575, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.512%.

Lakeland Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. NBT Bancorp offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Lakeland Financial pays 52.73% of its earnings as a dividend. NBT Bancorp pays out 44.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Financial quarterly revenues are $63.8M, which are smaller than NBT Bancorp quarterly revenues of $154.7M. Lakeland Financial's net income of $20.1M is lower than NBT Bancorp's net income of $36.7M. Notably, Lakeland Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.65x while NBT Bancorp's PE ratio is 14.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Financial is 5.84x versus 3.50x for NBT Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.