IMPP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a net margin of 30.47% compared to Imperial Petroleum's net margin of -6.19%. Imperial Petroleum's return on equity of 13.82% beat HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's return on equity of 0.81%.

Imperial Petroleum has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 160.42%. On the other hand HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Imperial Petroleum has higher upside potential than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA, analysts believe Imperial Petroleum is more attractive than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA.

Imperial Petroleum has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Imperial Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA offers a yield of 12.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Imperial Petroleum pays 3% of its earnings as a dividend. HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA pays out 47.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Imperial Petroleum quarterly revenues are $33M, which are smaller than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Imperial Petroleum's net income of $10.1M is higher than HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's net income of -$217.3M. Notably, Imperial Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.20x while HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA's PE ratio is 86.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Petroleum is 0.61x versus 0.16x for HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pyxis Tankers has a net margin of 30.47% compared to Imperial Petroleum's net margin of 26.91%. Imperial Petroleum's return on equity of 13.82% beat Pyxis Tankers's return on equity of 34.57%.

Imperial Petroleum has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 160.42%. On the other hand Pyxis Tankers has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 171.74%. Given that Pyxis Tankers has higher upside potential than Imperial Petroleum, analysts believe Pyxis Tankers is more attractive than Imperial Petroleum.

Imperial Petroleum has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pyxis Tankers has a beta of 0.031, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.933%.

Imperial Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pyxis Tankers offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Imperial Petroleum pays 3% of its earnings as a dividend. Pyxis Tankers pays out 2.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Imperial Petroleum quarterly revenues are $33M, which are larger than Pyxis Tankers quarterly revenues of $13.8M. Imperial Petroleum's net income of $10.1M is higher than Pyxis Tankers's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Imperial Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.20x while Pyxis Tankers's PE ratio is 1.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Petroleum is 0.61x versus 0.86x for Pyxis Tankers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tsakos Energy Navigation has a net margin of 30.47% compared to Imperial Petroleum's net margin of 13.26%. Imperial Petroleum's return on equity of 13.82% beat Tsakos Energy Navigation's return on equity of 11.15%.

Imperial Petroleum has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 160.42%. On the other hand Tsakos Energy Navigation has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 83.88%. Given that Imperial Petroleum has higher upside potential than Tsakos Energy Navigation, analysts believe Imperial Petroleum is more attractive than Tsakos Energy Navigation.

Imperial Petroleum has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tsakos Energy Navigation has a beta of -0.193, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.297%.

Imperial Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tsakos Energy Navigation offers a yield of 8.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Imperial Petroleum pays 3% of its earnings as a dividend. Tsakos Energy Navigation pays out 20.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Imperial Petroleum quarterly revenues are $33M, which are smaller than Tsakos Energy Navigation quarterly revenues of $200.2M. Imperial Petroleum's net income of $10.1M is lower than Tsakos Energy Navigation's net income of $26.5M. Notably, Imperial Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.20x while Tsakos Energy Navigation's PE ratio is 3.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Petroleum is 0.61x versus 0.60x for Tsakos Energy Navigation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOP Ships has a net margin of 30.47% compared to Imperial Petroleum's net margin of --. Imperial Petroleum's return on equity of 13.82% beat TOP Ships's return on equity of 1.31%.

Imperial Petroleum has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 160.42%. On the other hand TOP Ships has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 383.33%. Given that TOP Ships has higher upside potential than Imperial Petroleum, analysts believe TOP Ships is more attractive than Imperial Petroleum.

Imperial Petroleum has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Ships has a beta of 1.815, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.489%.

Imperial Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TOP Ships offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Imperial Petroleum pays 3% of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Ships pays out 99.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Imperial Petroleum quarterly revenues are $33M, which are larger than TOP Ships quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Petroleum's net income of $10.1M is higher than TOP Ships's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.20x while TOP Ships's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Petroleum is 0.61x versus 0.33x for TOP Ships. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.