HYFM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Art's-Way Manufacturing has a net margin of -35.49% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -1.09%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -28.31% beat Art's-Way Manufacturing's return on equity of 6.19%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 104.66%. On the other hand Art's-Way Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 251.76%. Given that Art's-Way Manufacturing has higher upside potential than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, analysts believe Art's-Way Manufacturing is more attractive than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Art's-Way Manufacturing has a beta of 0.637, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.267%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Art's-Way Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Art's-Way Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are larger than Art's-Way Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $5.1M. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$14.4M is lower than Art's-Way Manufacturing's net income of -$55.8K. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Art's-Way Manufacturing's PE ratio is 15.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group is 0.08x versus 0.42x for Art's-Way Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CEA Industries has a net margin of -35.49% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -149.77%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -28.31% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -33%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 104.66%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hydrofarm Holdings Group has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Hydrofarm Holdings Group is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.835, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.522%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $713.5K. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$14.4M is lower than CEA Industries's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group is 0.08x versus 1.71x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REV Group has a net margin of -35.49% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of 3.47%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -28.31% beat REV Group's return on equity of 21.81%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 104.66%. On the other hand REV Group has an analysts' consensus of $34.00 which suggests that it could fall by -11.67%. Given that Hydrofarm Holdings Group has higher upside potential than REV Group, analysts believe Hydrofarm Holdings Group is more attractive than REV Group.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REV Group has a beta of 1.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.029%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. REV Group offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. REV Group pays out 74.53% of its earnings as a dividend. REV Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are smaller than REV Group quarterly revenues of $525.1M. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$14.4M is lower than REV Group's net income of $18.2M. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while REV Group's PE ratio is 21.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group is 0.08x versus 0.88x for REV Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of -35.49% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -13.78%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -28.31% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 104.66%. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of $2.77 which suggests that it could grow by 593.4%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.597%.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues are $40.5M, which are larger than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$14.4M is lower than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Hydrofarm Holdings Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrofarm Holdings Group is 0.08x versus 0.08x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.