HHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Matthews International has a net margin of -5.17% compared to Harte-Hanks's net margin of -2.09%. Harte-Hanks's return on equity of -146.84% beat Matthews International's return on equity of -17.34%.

Harte-Hanks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 250%. On the other hand Matthews International has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 106.86%. Given that Harte-Hanks has higher upside potential than Matthews International, analysts believe Harte-Hanks is more attractive than Matthews International.

Harte-Hanks has a beta of -0.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.651% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews International has a beta of 1.200, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.998%.

Harte-Hanks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matthews International offers a yield of 4.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Harte-Hanks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International pays out -52.65% of its earnings as a dividend.

Harte-Hanks quarterly revenues are $47.1M, which are smaller than Matthews International quarterly revenues of $427.6M. Harte-Hanks's net income of -$2.4M is higher than Matthews International's net income of -$8.9M. Notably, Harte-Hanks's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matthews International's PE ratio is 30.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harte-Hanks is 0.20x versus 0.36x for Matthews International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NN has a net margin of -5.17% compared to Harte-Hanks's net margin of -19.69%. Harte-Hanks's return on equity of -146.84% beat NN's return on equity of -27.13%.

Harte-Hanks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 250%. On the other hand NN has an analysts' consensus of $6.67 which suggests that it could grow by 231.68%. Given that Harte-Hanks has higher upside potential than NN, analysts believe Harte-Hanks is more attractive than NN.

Harte-Hanks has a beta of -0.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.651% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NN has a beta of 2.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.07%.

Harte-Hanks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harte-Hanks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harte-Hanks quarterly revenues are $47.1M, which are smaller than NN quarterly revenues of $106.5M. Harte-Hanks's net income of -$2.4M is higher than NN's net income of -$21M. Notably, Harte-Hanks's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harte-Hanks is 0.20x versus 0.21x for NN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings has a net margin of -5.17% compared to Harte-Hanks's net margin of -70.61%. Harte-Hanks's return on equity of -146.84% beat Planet Green Holdings's return on equity of -80.05%.

Harte-Hanks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 250%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harte-Hanks has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings, analysts believe Harte-Hanks is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings.

Harte-Hanks has a beta of -0.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.651% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings has a beta of 0.412, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.785%.

Harte-Hanks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harte-Hanks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harte-Hanks quarterly revenues are $47.1M, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Harte-Hanks's net income of -$2.4M is lower than Planet Green Holdings's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Harte-Hanks's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harte-Hanks is 0.20x versus 3.46x for Planet Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard has a net margin of -5.17% compared to Harte-Hanks's net margin of 1.38%. Harte-Hanks's return on equity of -146.84% beat Seaboard's return on equity of 2.09%.

Harte-Hanks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 250%. On the other hand Seaboard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harte-Hanks has higher upside potential than Seaboard, analysts believe Harte-Hanks is more attractive than Seaboard.

Harte-Hanks has a beta of -0.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.651% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard has a beta of 0.114, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.634%.

Harte-Hanks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seaboard offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Harte-Hanks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard pays out 10.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harte-Hanks quarterly revenues are $47.1M, which are smaller than Seaboard quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Harte-Hanks's net income of -$2.4M is lower than Seaboard's net income of $32M. Notably, Harte-Hanks's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seaboard's PE ratio is 25.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harte-Hanks is 0.20x versus 0.27x for Seaboard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.