Financhill
Sell
48

FLL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$3.42
Seasonality move :
-0.43%
Day range:
$3.55 - $3.73
52-week range:
$2.86 - $5.90
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.44x
P/B ratio:
4.26x
Volume:
96K
Avg. volume:
186.2K
1-year change:
-29.36%
Market cap:
$132M
Revenue:
$292.1M
EPS (TTM):
-$1.11

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FLL
Full House Resorts
$74.2M -$0.19 6.47% -47.22% $4.75
BALY
Ballys
$594.5M -$1.01 3.14% -84.78% $14.00
BYD
Boyd Gaming
$972.6M $1.52 0.93% 11.32% $79.67
GDEN
Golden Entertainment
$163.6M $0.18 1.53% 1125% $35.43
ROLR
High Roller Technologies
-- -- -- -- --
RRR
Red Rock Resorts
$496M $0.45 -0.2% -32.63% $50.42
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FLL
Full House Resorts
$3.67 $4.75 $132M -- $0.00 0% 0.44x
BALY
Ballys
$11.07 $14.00 $542.6M -- $0.00 0% 0.22x
BYD
Boyd Gaming
$75.91 $79.67 $6.2B 12.38x $0.18 0.91% 1.73x
GDEN
Golden Entertainment
$29.43 $35.43 $778M 75.46x $0.25 3.4% 1.30x
ROLR
High Roller Technologies
$2.20 -- $18.4M -- $0.00 0% 0.66x
RRR
Red Rock Resorts
$47.10 $50.42 $2.8B 18.26x $1.00 2.12% 2.24x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FLL
Full House Resorts
93.83% 1.606 313.7% 0.56x
BALY
Ballys
99.08% 0.000 440.54% 0.43x
BYD
Boyd Gaming
72.27% 1.109 65.47% 0.67x
GDEN
Golden Entertainment
46.69% 1.725 58.95% 0.65x
ROLR
High Roller Technologies
1.55% 0.000 0.25% 0.69x
RRR
Red Rock Resorts
93.22% 0.989 124.4% 0.70x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FLL
Full House Resorts
$38.6M $956K -7.56% -78.31% 0.11% -$12.3M
BALY
Ballys
$312.6M $18M -14.37% -162.78% 3.83% -$16.8M
BYD
Boyd Gaming
$504.3M $232.2M 11.7% 34.42% 20.23% $86.5M
GDEN
Golden Entertainment
$90.8M $11.2M 1.17% 2.2% 6.88% $16.6M
ROLR
High Roller Technologies
$4.9M -$2M -339.37% -387.82% -25% -$2.7M
RRR
Red Rock Resorts
$311.5M $158.4M 4.23% 58.75% 30.1% $58M

Full House Resorts vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FLL or BALY?

    Ballys has a net margin of -13.01% compared to Full House Resorts's net margin of -14.78%. Full House Resorts's return on equity of -78.31% beat Ballys's return on equity of -162.78%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    51.49% -$0.27 $502.7M
    BALY
    Ballys
    53.86% -$1.75 $3.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About FLL or BALY?

    Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling upside risk potential of 29.43%. On the other hand Ballys has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.47%. Given that Full House Resorts has higher upside potential than Ballys, analysts believe Full House Resorts is more attractive than Ballys.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    2 1 0
    BALY
    Ballys
    0 5 0
  • Is FLL or BALY More Risky?

    Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.703, which suggesting that the stock is 70.342% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ballys has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLL or BALY?

    Full House Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ballys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Full House Resorts pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ballys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLL or BALY?

    Full House Resorts quarterly revenues are $75.1M, which are smaller than Ballys quarterly revenues of $580.4M. Full House Resorts's net income of -$9.8M is higher than Ballys's net income of -$85.8M. Notably, Full House Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ballys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full House Resorts is 0.44x versus 0.22x for Ballys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    0.44x -- $75.1M -$9.8M
    BALY
    Ballys
    0.22x -- $580.4M -$85.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns FLL or BYD?

    Boyd Gaming has a net margin of -13.01% compared to Full House Resorts's net margin of 11.24%. Full House Resorts's return on equity of -78.31% beat Boyd Gaming's return on equity of 34.42%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    51.49% -$0.27 $502.7M
    BYD
    Boyd Gaming
    50.86% $1.31 $4.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About FLL or BYD?

    Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling upside risk potential of 29.43%. On the other hand Boyd Gaming has an analysts' consensus of $79.67 which suggests that it could grow by 4.95%. Given that Full House Resorts has higher upside potential than Boyd Gaming, analysts believe Full House Resorts is more attractive than Boyd Gaming.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    2 1 0
    BYD
    Boyd Gaming
    7 6 0
  • Is FLL or BYD More Risky?

    Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.703, which suggesting that the stock is 70.342% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.145%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLL or BYD?

    Full House Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boyd Gaming offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Full House Resorts pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming pays out 10.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLL or BYD?

    Full House Resorts quarterly revenues are $75.1M, which are smaller than Boyd Gaming quarterly revenues of $991.6M. Full House Resorts's net income of -$9.8M is lower than Boyd Gaming's net income of $111.4M. Notably, Full House Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Boyd Gaming's PE ratio is 12.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full House Resorts is 0.44x versus 1.73x for Boyd Gaming. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    0.44x -- $75.1M -$9.8M
    BYD
    Boyd Gaming
    1.73x 12.38x $991.6M $111.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns FLL or GDEN?

    Golden Entertainment has a net margin of -13.01% compared to Full House Resorts's net margin of 1.55%. Full House Resorts's return on equity of -78.31% beat Golden Entertainment's return on equity of 2.2%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    51.49% -$0.27 $502.7M
    GDEN
    Golden Entertainment
    56.47% $0.09 $866.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About FLL or GDEN?

    Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling upside risk potential of 29.43%. On the other hand Golden Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $35.43 which suggests that it could grow by 18.44%. Given that Full House Resorts has higher upside potential than Golden Entertainment, analysts believe Full House Resorts is more attractive than Golden Entertainment.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    2 1 0
    GDEN
    Golden Entertainment
    5 1 0
  • Is FLL or GDEN More Risky?

    Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.703, which suggesting that the stock is 70.342% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Entertainment has a beta of 1.841, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.065%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLL or GDEN?

    Full House Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golden Entertainment offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Full House Resorts pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Entertainment pays out 42% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Entertainment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLL or GDEN?

    Full House Resorts quarterly revenues are $75.1M, which are smaller than Golden Entertainment quarterly revenues of $160.8M. Full House Resorts's net income of -$9.8M is lower than Golden Entertainment's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Full House Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Golden Entertainment's PE ratio is 75.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full House Resorts is 0.44x versus 1.30x for Golden Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    0.44x -- $75.1M -$9.8M
    GDEN
    Golden Entertainment
    1.30x 75.46x $160.8M $2.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns FLL or ROLR?

    High Roller Technologies has a net margin of -13.01% compared to Full House Resorts's net margin of -25.68%. Full House Resorts's return on equity of -78.31% beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -387.82%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    51.49% -$0.27 $502.7M
    ROLR
    High Roller Technologies
    60.5% -$0.29 $5.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About FLL or ROLR?

    Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling upside risk potential of 29.43%. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Full House Resorts has higher upside potential than High Roller Technologies, analysts believe Full House Resorts is more attractive than High Roller Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    2 1 0
    ROLR
    High Roller Technologies
    0 0 0
  • Is FLL or ROLR More Risky?

    Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.703, which suggesting that the stock is 70.342% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLL or ROLR?

    Full House Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Full House Resorts pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLL or ROLR?

    Full House Resorts quarterly revenues are $75.1M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $8.1M. Full House Resorts's net income of -$9.8M is lower than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Full House Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full House Resorts is 0.44x versus 0.66x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    0.44x -- $75.1M -$9.8M
    ROLR
    High Roller Technologies
    0.66x -- $8.1M -$2.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns FLL or RRR?

    Red Rock Resorts has a net margin of -13.01% compared to Full House Resorts's net margin of 8.99%. Full House Resorts's return on equity of -78.31% beat Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 58.75%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    51.49% -$0.27 $502.7M
    RRR
    Red Rock Resorts
    62.56% $0.75 $3.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About FLL or RRR?

    Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling upside risk potential of 29.43%. On the other hand Red Rock Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $50.42 which suggests that it could grow by 7.04%. Given that Full House Resorts has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, analysts believe Full House Resorts is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    2 1 0
    RRR
    Red Rock Resorts
    4 6 0
  • Is FLL or RRR More Risky?

    Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.703, which suggesting that the stock is 70.342% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 1.645, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.529%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLL or RRR?

    Full House Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Rock Resorts offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Full House Resorts pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts pays out 76.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FLL or RRR?

    Full House Resorts quarterly revenues are $75.1M, which are smaller than Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues of $497.9M. Full House Resorts's net income of -$9.8M is lower than Red Rock Resorts's net income of $44.7M. Notably, Full House Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Rock Resorts's PE ratio is 18.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full House Resorts is 0.44x versus 2.24x for Red Rock Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FLL
    Full House Resorts
    0.44x -- $75.1M -$9.8M
    RRR
    Red Rock Resorts
    2.24x 18.26x $497.9M $44.7M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Ginkgo Bioworks Stock a Good Buy?
Is Ginkgo Bioworks Stock a Good Buy?

Biotech innovator Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:DNA) has had better…

Why Mobileye Might Be Wall Street’s Next Big Surprise
Why Mobileye Might Be Wall Street’s Next Big Surprise

The trend to automate vehicles started long ago when adding…

Why Is Rigetti Stock Going Up?
Why Is Rigetti Stock Going Up?

Quantum computing firm Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ:RGTI) has been one of…

Stock Ideas

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
81
SMLR alert for May 19

Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 5.85% over the past day.

Sell
25
GLOB alert for May 19

Globant SA [GLOB] is up 4.02% over the past day.

Buy
94
HIMS alert for May 19

Hims & Hers Health [HIMS] is down 3.57% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock