FFAI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Envirotech Vehicles has a net margin of -- compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -92.9%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -- beat Envirotech Vehicles's return on equity of -65.84%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9320289.28%. On the other hand Envirotech Vehicles has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5330.57%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Envirotech Vehicles, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Envirotech Vehicles.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envirotech Vehicles has a beta of 2.730, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 172.992%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envirotech Vehicles offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envirotech Vehicles pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Envirotech Vehicles quarterly revenues of $812.8K. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -- is lower than Envirotech Vehicles's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envirotech Vehicles's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is 43.91x versus 2.20x for Envirotech Vehicles. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of -- compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -169.41%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -- beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -70.84%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9320289.28%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.55 which suggests that it could grow by 2.18%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $234.5M. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -- is lower than Lucid Group's net income of -$397.2M. Notably, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is 43.91x versus 7.57x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of -- compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -42.85%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -- beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9320289.28%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.46 which suggests that it could grow by 26.04%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -- is lower than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is 43.91x versus 2.34x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group has a net margin of -- compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -1001.53%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -- beat Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9320289.28%. On the other hand Workhorse Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 60%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Workhorse Group.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.987, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 198.662%.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Workhorse Group quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -- is lower than Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M. Notably, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is 43.91x versus 0.41x for Workhorse Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.